Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

WTF with high school questions?

letmypeoplecode.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

81–90 of 238 posts

Re: WTF with high school questions?

#81

Post by vdqtp3 »

renewiltord wrote: post #37

Personally, I don't know any awesome engineers who sucked at school. I don't know if any of them would work at Canonical (which has exhausted most of its growth potential by now), though. Nothing wrong with the question, imho, if you have lots of applicants. I doubt it adversely selects for the job. It drops a lot of legitimately skilled people, but every method does. For interviewing, it makes sense to budget an amo…

> I don't know any awesome engineers who sucked at school

This makes me think you don't know many awesome engineers.

Re: WTF with high school questions?

#83

Post by mperham »

jackmott42 wrote: post #72
jdthedisciple wrote: post #29

Why do recruiters have such trouble with such a simple task like gauging a candidate's real skills? Seriously. Here is how to do it. I'm looking for a React Developer, I ask the following simple questions: 1. Tell my about your contributions to major projects you have been involved in. (if they share their work ask more in-depth questions about it) 2. With $givenTechnologyStack, how do you usually solve state managem…

There are people who are good at tech, but not good at casual conversation about tech. They may not know your terminology even though they are familiar with the concepts, and they may be afraid to ask for clarification on your terminology. And rightly so, as I've heard people act like I am a moron for asking "What exactly do you mean by TECH_BUZZWORD?" Also when people research interviewing styles, the "conversationa…

> There are people who are good at tech, but not good at casual conversation about tech.

Effective communication skills are also important.

Re: WTF with high school questions?

#84

Post by kube-system »

dymk wrote: post #59
ryandrake wrote: post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think OP was just pointing out the irony of complaining about high school English questions while making a high school-level English usage mistake (would of vs. would have)

English prescriptivists are even more ironic-er. If they'd of bothered to take even an undergraduate level course in linguistics, they'd understand how wasteful a pastime "grammar nazi" is.

"Would of" is just is a misspelling of "would've".

Re: WTF with high school questions?

#85

Post by layer8 »

irrational wrote: post #42

I went to High School in the 1980s. I think I did okay in those classes, but I fail to see how something that happened more than 30 years ago would be relevant for hiring purposes in the 2020s.

They may not be interested in applicants for which that was already 30 years ago. (Their loss, of course.)

Re: WTF with high school questions?

#86

Post by yellow_lead »

anonu wrote: post #25

While I agree that questions about High School are dumb, if a candidate answered the question with "this question is irrelevant" in a free-form text field (as they did in the screenshot), I would probably thing twice about hiring the person.

I would agree assuming the questions are somewhat relevant (they aren't)

Re: WTF with high school questions?

#87

Post by mosquitobiten »

juice_bus wrote: post #2

It feels like Canonical does this silly shit so only the truly desperate will apply, and thus take lower compensation. I would of closed the tab pretty quickly.

Truly desperate or people with ulterior motives maybe, don't want to be paranoid but maybe only someone who is working undercover for some agency would want to go through that lengthy process of the interview. Maybe Canonical thinks this way it can detect this kind of people. idk

Re: WTF with high school questions?

#88

Post by randomdata »

irrational wrote: post #42

I went to High School in the 1980s. I think I did okay in those classes, but I fail to see how something that happened more than 30 years ago would be relevant for hiring purposes in the 2020s.

Fodder for discrimination lawsuits. The more information they have like this, the more they have to work with when defending a suit. School-based discrimination has been deemed legally acceptable, thus "Our records indicate the plaintiff did not meet our high school expectations. She was not hired for that reason."

Re: WTF with high school questions?

#89

Post by kragen »

skybrian wrote: post #62
jdthedisciple wrote: post #29

Why do recruiters have such trouble with such a simple task like gauging a candidate's real skills? Seriously. Here is how to do it. I'm looking for a React Developer, I ask the following simple questions: 1. Tell my about your contributions to major projects you have been involved in. (if they share their work ask more in-depth questions about it) 2. With $givenTechnologyStack, how do you usually solve state managem…

I suspect that you are overconfident and will get fooled by someone who knows the culture well and isn’t so great at coding.

yeah but knowing their high school gpa probably makes that worse rather than better

Re: WTF with high school questions?

#90

Post by marcus0x62 »

anonu wrote: post #25

While I agree that questions about High School are dumb, if a candidate answered the question with "this question is irrelevant" in a free-form text field (as they did in the screenshot), I would probably thing twice about hiring the person.

I would only need to think once about not hiring them. Sorry not sorry.
Post reply on HN