Live data from Hacker News

Kristall – a browser without support for CSS/JS/WASM or graphical websites

kristall.random-projects.net

81–90 of 198 posts

Re: Kristall – a browser without support for CSS/JS/WASM or graphical websites

#81
post #7

kristall is along with geminaut and lagrange, the perfect triptych for wandering the small web! until recently they were the only ones to pass (almost) torture tests [1]! highly recommended [1] gemini://gemini.conman.org/test/torture/

amfora passes all torture tests.

Re: Kristall – a browser without support for CSS/JS/WASM or graphical websites

#82
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is nothing about HTML/CSS/JS that prevents simplicity. It is purely how it has been used and abused. You can also disable JS and use user agent stylesheets in any modern web browser.

You can read a book on your tablet / laptop, or even watch a movie adaptation; or you can read a book on dead trees. Some people would like to recreate certain aspects of the "dead tree" experience without actually killing trees.

use a dedicated ebook reader.

Re: Kristall – a browser without support for CSS/JS/WASM or graphical websites

#83
post #60

As someone who has come to prefer viewing web-pages in reader-mode rather than their default-layouts, I really love the idea of having a leaner, more minimalist web. Just pure content without all the bloat... How have I never heard about this before?

I feel the same. I've often wondered how much is missing from servo if we just wanted a noscript browser. It would be nice if redox os had a rust only browser.

Re: Kristall – a browser without support for CSS/JS/WASM or graphical websites

#84
post #40

Hacker News on Kristall: https://imgur.com/a/lhq8iCw http, https are disabled by default, they need to be enabled in File/Settings/Generic. I was hoping it would be a single executable but (on Windows) it's 56 files: 1 exe, 33 dedicated dlls, 22 translation files. Google Search does not work, it's impossible to get past the cookie consent page: https://imgur.com/a/daGMASS (Same thing happens if one tries to put the s…

yeah, for me the kristall website also didnt work in kristall.. not sure if i'm doing something wrong

https://www.dropbox.com/s/xtezzcsm2qcat8a/Screenshot%202023-...

Re: Kristall – a browser without support for CSS/JS/WASM or graphical websites

#88
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can Lynx render Gemini markup?

Is there anything on gemini other than people talking about gemini? Not trying to be facetious but last time I looked I couldn't find anything. I'm sort of directionally sympathetic to their goals so I want it to be a case where there is great stuff there that I just didn't know how to find.

Just glancing at the Antenna feed, there are about 10 posts a day, and one a day about Gemini. Most content is just blog-post updates on computers and people’s lives.

Antenna is an aggregator feed for Geminispace. You can subscribe to it with a Gemini client that supports Atom feeds.

=> gemini://warmedal.se/~antenna/ Antenna on Geminispace

Re: Kristall – a browser without support for CSS/JS/WASM or graphical websites

#89
post #40

Hacker News on Kristall: https://imgur.com/a/lhq8iCw http, https are disabled by default, they need to be enabled in File/Settings/Generic. I was hoping it would be a single executable but (on Windows) it's 56 files: 1 exe, 33 dedicated dlls, 22 translation files. Google Search does not work, it's impossible to get past the cookie consent page: https://imgur.com/a/daGMASS (Same thing happens if one tries to put the s…

It seems to work a lot better on Linux. Screenshots of both the front page of HN and of this topic: https://imgur.com/a/Armz49a

Re: Kristall – a browser without support for CSS/JS/WASM or graphical websites

#90
post #79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Fully agree. I am also wondering why simplicity needs its own protocol here. Striving for simplicity is more a philosophical than a technical task. Edit: The creation of new protocols and technical solutions alone increases cognitive complexity. From this point of view, it is even counterproductive if existing solutions can enable the same.

I think perhaps having their own protocol serve to encapsulate the community interested in this particular form of simplicity.

That's pretty much the stated objective, in addition to designing the protocol in a way that freezes features at the outset to prevent it from becoming another Web 2.0.
Post reply on HN