This is fantastic, but not fully in the spirit of the old web. Personal pages looked like they did because they were essentially outsider art: the product of experimentation by teenagers and rank amateurs, who had no idea what we were doing. In 1999 we were using Netscape Composer and FrontPage Express, because they came with our browsers and were fun to explore. Only a web professional could use these tricks today t…
> FrontPage
Building a website like it's 1999
81–90 of 99 posts
Re: Building a website like it's 1999
#82Frankly speaking I do not understand why a blog like yours is getting so many hits , whereas surely something like this written by me or 99 percent of the users in HN can never get such traction. I understand the reason for this is that you are somebody whereas we are nobodies. That’s why I don’t think that outside this niche of people who appreciate this idea it wound really take off. We are not going to wake up tom…
Do you not think the author is one of the "99 percent of users" of HN?
Re: Building a website like it's 1999
#83During this time, if you had broadband and a moderately fast computer, browsing the web lightning fast.
Then came the frameworks and, especially after smartphones, the adaptive web for small mobile-first(ish, or second or whatever) screen sizes and the bloat began. Previously you only had to worry about pages that dumped flash ads or used flash for every UI element, they were still slow. Then everything became about as slow as before.
I still think browsing is a bit faster than the dialup days, but not as fast as the golden age from '97-'04. It seems now that page loads sizes & javascript CPU load expand at roughly the pave of computing power & bandwidth availability.
Which means it's a pretty awful experience for anyone on a low end computer w/ broadband that barely meets the definition.
Re: Building a website like it's 1999
#84There was a three pass rendering system, and I was writing with CSS, but in the final filter I was string replacing font-face in in place of the classes because or poor support in browsers.
Re: Building a website like it's 1999
#85"Cool" - You guys weren't getting bullied like me?
Re: Building a website like it's 1999
#86This is fantastic, but not fully in the spirit of the old web. Personal pages looked like they did because they were essentially outsider art: the product of experimentation by teenagers and rank amateurs, who had no idea what we were doing. In 1999 we were using Netscape Composer and FrontPage Express, because they came with our browsers and were fun to explore. Only a web professional could use these tricks today t…
Re: Building a website like it's 1999
#87Earlier quoted context omitted.
> FrontPage
I only had Notepad (the default Windows text editor). I longed for Microsoft Frontpage and HoTMetaL and Dreamweaver. Looking back, I'm glad gained experience on the native experience rather than through the editor abstractions because it forced me to learn.
Re: Building a website like it's 1999
#88This is fantastic, but not fully in the spirit of the old web. Personal pages looked like they did because they were essentially outsider art: the product of experimentation by teenagers and rank amateurs, who had no idea what we were doing. In 1999 we were using Netscape Composer and FrontPage Express, because they came with our browsers and were fun to explore. Only a web professional could use these tricks today t…
> FrontPage
Re: Building a website like it's 1999
#89Re: Building a website like it's 1999
#90Earlier quoted context omitted.
I used coolpage :D http://web.archive.org/web/20010517033954/http://www.klimane...
HotDog Professional, anyone? https://archive.org/details/tucows_194462_HotDog_Professiona...