76% whats your score?
Show HN: Can you tell if an image is AI-generated?
81–90 of 107 posts
Re: Show HN: Can you tell if an image is AI-generated?
#8219/30
Interestingly, I'm not experienced with AI art, but I am a photographer and used to do 3D graphics. I focused on composition, interest and "overhype" - yes you could add a glow / halo effect here, but does it look right? Would this photo be interesting to a photographer, or is it a bit meh?
So while my hit rate is lower than others mentioned on this thread (and not inconsistent with 50:50 guess really, so p-value of 12%), it feels like there are some non-detail aspects that aren't human.
But even then, distinguishibility doesn't mean it's bad. For the most part, these were all very "accomplished" pictures - if you could make them as a human, you would be pretty pleased with yourself.
Re: Show HN: Can you tell if an image is AI-generated?
#83aww, you don't get to see your mistakes? I got 80% right. Always interesting what where the clue can be found (fancy mirroring, subtle but correct things, small text, textures, eyes, hands...)
Re: Show HN: Can you tell if an image is AI-generated?
#84Being on /r/StableDiffusion teaches you so many things AI is bad at.
You correctly classified 29 of 30 (96%) images!
You identified 15 of 15 (100%) AI-generated images.
You identified 14 of 15 (93%) human-made images.
- missing symmetry in faces, symmetry in clothes/costumes
- lines ending up nowhere. AI diffuses lines into something else often
- bad hands, bad eyes
- nonsensible scale e.g. a mountain shouldn't look that big or that small
- missing consistency. AI tends to loose consistency easily.
- badly written text, AI can not do text properly. if you can make sense of text its not by AI
Re: Show HN: Can you tell if an image is AI-generated?
#85When it's artwork, how good can we assume the humans to be? Because some look very much like they could have been done by AI, or a mediocre human...
Re: Show HN: Can you tell if an image is AI-generated?
#86Being on /r/StableDiffusion teaches you so many things AI is bad at. You correctly classified 29 of 30 (96%) images! You identified 15 of 15 (100%) AI-generated images. You identified 14 of 15 (93%) human-made images. I looked for - missing symmetry in faces, symmetry in clothes/costumes - lines ending up nowhere. AI diffuses lines into something else often - bad hands, bad eyes - nonsensible scale e.g. a mountain sh…
I'm not on /r/StableDiffusion and just by reading your comment beforehand, I managed to get 23 of 30. Not bad.
Re: Show HN: Can you tell if an image is AI-generated?
#87Re: Show HN: Can you tell if an image is AI-generated?
#88Being on /r/StableDiffusion teaches you so many things AI is bad at. You correctly classified 29 of 30 (96%) images! You identified 15 of 15 (100%) AI-generated images. You identified 14 of 15 (93%) human-made images. I looked for - missing symmetry in faces, symmetry in clothes/costumes - lines ending up nowhere. AI diffuses lines into something else often - bad hands, bad eyes - nonsensible scale e.g. a mountain sh…
That's a great summary. Another telltale sign is the discontinuity in the partially obstructed background.
If you have a human subject in the foreground, the parts of the background to the left and to the right of the subject do not connect properly. What should be single continuous parts of a building, a window, a railing or a landscape are drawn on different heights or otherwise do not form a whole structure.
Re: Show HN: Can you tell if an image is AI-generated?
#89Being on /r/StableDiffusion teaches you so many things AI is bad at. You correctly classified 29 of 30 (96%) images! You identified 15 of 15 (100%) AI-generated images. You identified 14 of 15 (93%) human-made images. I looked for - missing symmetry in faces, symmetry in clothes/costumes - lines ending up nowhere. AI diffuses lines into something else often - bad hands, bad eyes - nonsensible scale e.g. a mountain sh…
That's a great summary. Another telltale sign is the discontinuity in the partially obstructed background. If you have a human subject in the foreground, the parts of the background to the left and to the right of the subject do not connect properly. What should be single continuous parts of a building, a window, a railing or a landscape are drawn on different heights or otherwise do not form a whole structure.
By consistency I was meaning to say wrong continuity as you put it.
BTW for some anime images I felt like i have seen them on that subreddit. Even if not those exact images, I have seen similar. That particular style (coloring, smoothness etc) also made me look carefully for flaws.
Re: Show HN: Can you tell if an image is AI-generated?
#90Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's a great summary. Another telltale sign is the discontinuity in the partially obstructed background. If you have a human subject in the foreground, the parts of the background to the left and to the right of the subject do not connect properly. What should be single continuous parts of a building, a window, a railing or a landscape are drawn on different heights or otherwise do not form a whole structure.
By consistency I was meaning to say wrong continuity as you put it. BTW for some anime images I felt like i have seen them on that subreddit. Even if not those exact images, I have seen similar. That particular style (coloring, smoothness etc) also made me look carefully for flaws.
Those particular images were so generic with the characters lacking any distinct traits, they could have easily been from either Stable Diffusion, or some ultra-low budget visual novel.