Earlier quoted context omitted.
Human rights? That's kind of a tenuous link at best. You could make the case that buying more increases the opportunities for those at the bottom. I'm not even necessarily making a factual statement here, but personally I don't feel that there's anything to reconcile.
A lot of raw materials that go into modern electronics are produced using slave labor, and the “recycled” devices tend to end up poisoning the environments of people in similarly disadvantaged communities. I don’t know enough about these things to know whether buying more or less of these devices directly helps enslaved people, but I don’t think it’s a stretch to observe that rampant consumerism does fuel the postcol…
A sufficiently technologically advanced human species might be the only thing capable of stopping the next extinction event. Something that will almost certainly occur naturally without any intervention.