81–90 of 90 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The UK is fighting a losing battle. Right now they snoop SNI headers and terminate connections to banned websites. But ECH is ready to be rolled out
ECH can't be mandatory as many enterprises (that take security seriously) will block it, so they'll also be able to. No?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> However, 'ping 1.1' is a convenient shortcut (actually pings 1.0.0.1). Convenient for who!? that one guy that put his home network in 10.0.0 class ?
I suppose you use 172.16/12? :P
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Was more pointing out the numbered hostname, not the service its-self. 16777217 is just the lowest number that corresponds with a routed IP address :)
It's not. 1 is (0.0.0.1) https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/lin...
$ man 3 inet_aton […] inet_aton() converts the Internet host address cp from the IPv4 numbers-and-dots notation into binary form (in network byte order) and stores it in the structure that inp points to. inet_aton() returns nonzero if the address is valid, zero if not. The address supplied in cp can have one of the following forms: a.b.c.d Each of the four numeric parts specifies a byte of the address; the bytes are…
This is just a convention from BSD, and is not even POSIX compliant. However, 'ping 1.1' is a convenient shortcut (actually pings 1.0.0.1). iproute2 and systemd do not use inet_aton and don't follow this BSD4.2 convention and instead parse it as '1.1.0.0' or not at all.
https://github.com/golang/go/issues/36822#issuecomment-57938...
Also RFC 3986.
Golang's url.Parse works :) https://go.dev/play/p/A6O6yrSDrZm
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hey now, what is wrong with 10. class at home ;-)? I chose 10, for simpler segmentation in my head primarily as I have a lot of devices in my house (10. . .n), less chance of conflict as devices come online (devices i connect often are coded to 192, VPNs, etc.), helps with my VPNs between my locations.
There is a good chance if you work for company that they will use 10.x for their server stuff. For similar reason we also steered away from home router area of 192.168.X.X for our company network stuff.
You can also try my tool online which obfuscate an ip address. https://wannabe1337.xyz/text-ipobfuscator
I'm guessing advertising ddos / stressor services.
You can also try my tool online which obfuscate an ip address. https://wannabe1337.xyz/text-ipobfuscator
You may want to be aware that your banner ad was advertising layer 4/7 most powerful services. I'm guessing advertising ddos / stressor services.
hxxps://cybervm[.]io/?wannabe1337.xyz