I found Bionic 10% slower than Literata. But I also found I am a verrrry slow reader. My reading speed came to 147 wpm. Any recommendation to improve this?
An experiment to test if Bionic Reading helps you read faster
81–90 of 100 posts
Re: An experiment to test if Bionic Reading helps you read faster
#82Bionic reading: 317 WPM Literata: 317 WPM You read 0% faster with Bionic Reading I guess I’m a pretty consistent slow reader.
Way faster than me, and at the top end of average, based on everything I can find online. I'm curious though, what the average is among "readers" lol.
I do read quickly but I have read that essay before, so perhaps I only skimmed it. I wasn't certain on one of the comprehension questions.
Re: An experiment to test if Bionic Reading helps you read faster
#83Re: An experiment to test if Bionic Reading helps you read faster
#84https://speed.readwise.io Your results Typeface Bionic Reading Literata Article 1 591 WPM 352 WPM Article 2 657 WPM 457 WPM Average Speed 624 WPM 405 WPM You read 43% faster with Bionic Reading Guess gotta give this a try for storybooks... maybe some enterprising and bored HN nerd can make a Calibre plugin that converts regular epubs to bionic reading enabled epub files ---- but the truth is, for the aforementioned s…
Jeeze that is fast. More than twice the average reading speed. I wonder if bionic reading helps more for "speed readers"? Your results surely suggest it. Also - It must be so painful for you to type, or heck even speak!
Re: An experiment to test if Bionic Reading helps you read faster
#85Would it work with languages that have longer words and a case system?
Re: An experiment to test if Bionic Reading helps you read faster
#86I don't understand. From their own metrics - speed went up by a lower percentage than comprehension dropped. This sounds like a terrible idea...
Re: An experiment to test if Bionic Reading helps you read faster
#87Re: An experiment to test if Bionic Reading helps you read faster
#88Re: An experiment to test if Bionic Reading helps you read faster
#89Earlier quoted context omitted.
Note that my natural reading speed is ~950 wpm, so I tend to ignore these fads. Were you just born with 4-5x the average reading speed? Or did you employ some other 'fads'? This seems pretty astonishing. Particularly in light of the following sentence on the "Speed Reading" entry on Wikipedia: > Cognitive neuroscientist Stanislas Dehaene says that claims of reading up to 1,000 words per minute "must be viewed with sk…
I simply read a lot of science fiction/fantasy as a kid, and it happened naturally. I would view claims that a random person could be taught to read at my speed with skepticism. But I've met other people who read as fast as I do. As a kid I thought I was simply a slightly fast reader until I happened to take a copy of https://www.amazon.com/Clan-Cave-Bear-Jean-Auel/dp/060961097... to a bath. I started, got caught up…
Re: An experiment to test if Bionic Reading helps you read faster
#90Linked at the end of the article is the short (15 minutes maybe) self-test: https://speed.readwise.io/ . Curious what results people here got. I got 23% faster with BR but I couldn't tell if I was just trying harder.
As the article says, a better comparison may be to have a fake version of BR as the control.