Earlier quoted context omitted.
Totally fair; and I wasn't intending to pick on this example in particular. However, I see a lot of this "look at this amazing shit we pulled with CSS" that's generally inapplicable beyond their (admittedly cool) example.
The other week, I heard a developer talking about one of these "amazing shit we pulled with CSS" examples and excitedly tried his hand at a few inspirations of his own. (Sadly, they didn't go further than his own machine.) Later, as he was working on a new feature, he realized he could achieve a particular effect without any images for a slight improvement in performance (fewer requests and all that). That achievemen…
Famous Logos Designed Entirely in CSS
81–84 of 84 posts
Re: Famous Logos Designed Entirely in CSS
#82This is cool but isn't this what SVG (ignoring browser incompatibilities) is for? CSS is for affecting the layout of the content. In most uses a logo is content, that content could still be affected by style, but I don't think it should be entirely defined by CSS.
SVG is available in any browser that supports all the selectors being use (i.e. it'll not work in IE6/7/8 with CVG, but these CSS versions probably won't either), and the code for them in SVG would be significantly smaller then that markup+styling I'd wager.
Re: Famous Logos Designed Entirely in CSS
#83Re: Famous Logos Designed Entirely in CSS
#84Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ringed a bell http://www.imgtocss.com/
I love that it actually converts the image to a table with bgcolor attributes. It doesn't rely on CSS at all.
[1] http://www.imgtocss.com/convert?url=http://www.imgtocss.com/...