Live data from Hacker News

Apple announces 27-inch 5K Studio Display

apple.com

81–90 of 438 posts

Re: Apple announces 27-inch 5K Studio Display

#81

I realize that as a staunch Linux user I'm not in their target demographic, but... wow that website is slightly motion sickness inducing. Is it as bad to scroll through this on a mac as it is on linux? I use a mouse with an actual wheel, maybe they don't optimize for that kind of legacy device...? Edit: it's also just so hard to scroll exactly to the points where the information is presented. I just mostly end up at…

[deleted]

Re: Apple announces 27-inch 5K Studio Display

#82

Would be nice to have >5K resolutions to have more pixel density. Alas, macOS doesn't support any native scaling other than 100% and 200%. So if they did release e.g. a 27" 8K monitor, the text would either be too small, or they'd have to use bitmap scaling to make it bigger in which case there'd be no advantage of having an 8K monitor. (EDIT: To clarify, all other scaling factors are done by rendering at either 100%…

Macs does support non-integer scaling. In fact, macOS currently ships non-integer scaling by default in certain MBP models. It gets criticized from time to tome, though the newer 14/16” MBPs ship 200% as default again.

> It gets criticized from time to tome, though the newer 14/16” MBPs ship 200% as default again.

The new 2021 MacBook Pros were such a great design and it's clear how every small thing points to them being the greatest since 2015 Pros.

Re: Apple announces 27-inch 5K Studio Display

#84
post #21

Finally an AR coating on a monitor without the grainy sparkly look! I bought 3 highly rated monitors last year and returned all but one because the anti reflective coatings were visually distracting and made the screen look dirty and unsharp. The one I kept still has the effect, but to an “acceptable” degree relative to the others and I was tired of returning monitors. Hopefully other manufacturers will follow suit -…

The thing is, for most people a glossy monitor with an AR coating is a good compromise, since reflections are a lot more distracting than a slightly matte finish. For a studio monitor this isn't a consideration, but in general the finish is mentioned in the specifications.

Re: Apple announces 27-inch 5K Studio Display

#85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I hardly notice when switching between my M1Pro monitor and larger 27" monitor. Sure my monitor do support 144Hz, but im running it at 60Hz... because docking station

There is a world of difference between 60 Hz and 144 Hz, though. I don’t think I can go back to anything less than 120.

Yeah it feels horrible now.

When I got my iPhone 13 pro it cost me an M1 iPad and a 14” MBP because everything felt horrible afterwards.

Re: Apple announces 27-inch 5K Studio Display

#86
post #2

As a person who works on a Mac but uses a Windows PC for gaming: a pity this only has USB-C inputs, so you won't be able to connect a PC with an RTX 30xx card to it. Still very cool though.

Amazingly, NVidia cards had this port on previous generation models, but it got removed for some reason. (Though it's actually not clear to me it would work; they did some non-standard stuff to get USB 3.1 instead of USB 2.0 alongside DisplayPort lanes.)

Re: Apple announces 27-inch 5K Studio Display

#87
post #26

I like this announcement, because it means that there's a manufacturing line for proper HiDPI [1] displays running in some LG factory somewhere that third party manufactures like LG/Dell/Iiyama can hopefully use to give us some fresh good-looking 27" 5K desktop monitors. It boggles my mind how little attention very high pixel density displays have been getting from PC display manufacturers. I would also be first in l…

They've had the iMac line using these displays forever and it hasn't filtered down to other display makers. Only LG via the ultrafine line has used these densities (also Windows and Linux support is lacking or janky)

Iiyama [1], Dell [2] and LG used a 27" 5K iMac display for a little while, but as production at Apple wound down you can no longer really buy those in most places.

[1]: https://www.anandtech.com/show/12568/iiyamas-prolite-xb2779q...

[2]: https://www.dell.com/ae/business/p/dell-up2715k-monitor/pd

Re: Apple announces 27-inch 5K Studio Display

#88

I realize that as a staunch Linux user I'm not in their target demographic, but... wow that website is slightly motion sickness inducing. Is it as bad to scroll through this on a mac as it is on linux? I use a mouse with an actual wheel, maybe they don't optimize for that kind of legacy device...? Edit: it's also just so hard to scroll exactly to the points where the information is presented. I just mostly end up at…

Mac pointing devices have step-less and inertial scrolling, so the scrolling itself is effortless, but the framerate of the "video" is too low, so it's either not fluid enough unless you scroll like crazy.

Re: Apple announces 27-inch 5K Studio Display

#89
post #56

Are people really paying 1.6k for a 60hz monitor?

Different priorities. People buying these are looking for good specs in color reproduction, contrast (as far as is possible without FALD backlighting), and perhaps most importantly consistent QC.

If you look at reviews for just about any model of monitor released in the past 5-6 years QC has been atrocious, with dead pixels, backlight bleed, and other odd issues being commonplace, making it a challenge to get a unit that's good all around. This has been especially true for the display that this is most directly replacing (LG Ultrafine 5k).

Re: Apple announces 27-inch 5K Studio Display

#90
post #5

No 120hz listed in the tech specs, that’s gonna be jarring for people with a M1 macbook pro.

There's a good reason for this: Thunderbolt 4 doesn't have enough port bandwidth. TB4 can carry a max of 30Gbps but 5K @ 120hz is 32Gbps. There's no way Apple would do two cables for this, and the next gen of Thunderbolt is a while off, so the choice makes sense.
Post reply on HN