Live data from Hacker News

Duck DNS – free dynamic DNS hosted on AWS

duckdns.org

81–90 of 103 posts

Re: Duck DNS – free dynamic DNS hosted on AWS

#81
post #56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What's more interesting is that DDG had disputes with Google over the ownership of the duck.com domain. Google was squatting on the domain and redirected it to Google (dirty tactic). But I guess it could just as easily have gone to the Oregon Ducks or some duck based website. (interestingly "ducks.com" doesn't go anywhere for me)

google already does enough atrocious things, you don't have to make them up.

[deleted]

Re: Duck DNS – free dynamic DNS hosted on AWS

#82

For anyone hosting their domain on Google Domains, there's a neat API endpoint they're offering for updating the DNS with a simple CURL. I've been using this for years now for a public Raspberry PI behind a home router that changes IPs every other day. curl -s -k --user "username:password" "https://domains.google.com/nic/update?hostname=yourdomain.com" There's more parameters (and you can specify an IP, the above req…

Not only did I have no idea about this, but I was certain this didn't exist on purpose as there is a paid "Cloud DNS" in Google Cloud.

Does this mean Let's Encrypt dns-01 challenges could be automated?

[edit: Oh the API only allows changing an A record, for dynamic DNS, not updating anything else in the zone. That makes more sense.]

Re: Duck DNS – free dynamic DNS hosted on AWS

#84

Why AWS? How about we start building services that work anywhere instead of targeting a platform owned by a company that avoids paying billions in taxes? Edit - I'll leave my original comment up but I originally thought this was a service that users could deploy themselves into their own AWS accounts which it is not. It is, as it says, a DDNS service which is free. The fact that it's hosted in AWS should be neither h…

It kinda gives a sense of how it works. AWS means it's not just a handwritten script on a VPS somewhere, it's probably maintained with lots of automation, etc.

It kind of gives it a sense of professionalism for marketing purposes.

Re: Duck DNS – free dynamic DNS hosted on AWS

#85
I have used DuckDNS for nearly a decade. I highly, highly recommend them. It's never not worked, super simple to set up on any server or always on system, and just is exactly what you want if you're a hobbyist.

The only possible downside is that you end up with a url with "duckdns.org" in it, but I don't mind

Re: Duck DNS – free dynamic DNS hosted on AWS

#86
I love DuckDNS but we seriously need a more automated and integrated solution to this kind of thing. It's the missing piece that holds self hosted back.

Something that:

* Lets you set up a domain with a single command

* Handles security for you. There shouldn't be any manual admin needed to make a secure context site

* Works offline on the LAN if possible, and on Yggdrasil meshes.

I should be able to buy a device, plug it in, then scan the QR code on it's display and be instantly taken to its website, no setup or account creation.

Unfortunately the web blocks all insecure requests from within secure contexts, and has no MDNS type functionality, so building a P2P solution with service workers or something is very hard/impossible.

DuckDNS is really almost there. It's the security that makes it hard, Let's Encrypt is not exactly consumer grade.

Re: Duck DNS – free dynamic DNS hosted on AWS

#87

This has nothing in common with DuckDuckGo? DDG (unfortunately) is bigger and bigger with every year. They are developing desktop browser, email proxy etc. I wouldn't be surprised if they'd lunched DDGDNS.

Why is it unfortunate that DDG is bigger and bigger every year?

The larger the crowd the more likely the company is to monetise the service? Or just sell the eyeballs?

I'd like to think DDG were too principled to do this, but money can really direct moral compasses in large enough quantities.

Re: Duck DNS – free dynamic DNS hosted on AWS

#88
post #83

New to this. "Practically", it seems the same as ngrok or tor onion services. Is that right?

No. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_Name_System

I'm familiar with DNS and read the FAQ. But, "Practically", it's used for external services(ssh, http) to get to your device. Right? Are there practical use differences?

Re: Duck DNS – free dynamic DNS hosted on AWS

#89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

so I mentioned the same thing, though one thing to note (which I doubt duck dns helps with either). Is one can't use google's dynamic dns with AAAA records (i.e. ipv6). Personally, I think this is massive oversight on their part.

I have dynamic A and AAAA records with Google Domains. I'm not sure why it doesn't work for you. Here's the relevant portion of my ddclient config: protocol=googledomains login=XXXXXXX password=XXXXXXX host4.mydomain.com protocol=googledomains use=web web=checkipv6.dyndns.org/ ipv6=yes login=XXXXXXXC password=XXXXXXX host6.mydomain.com

ok, so you're doing a manual update?

when I go into the web ui for my domain and go to create a dynamic dns name, it only gives me an option for only an A record.

My "guess" is that your solution is to create a normal AAAA record and ddclient can update that record with the info retrieved from checkipv6.dyndns.org? so not using google's UI to setup a AAAA dyn dns record? and my guess is that username/password scoping that you got for host4 worked the same for the "fake static" AAAA record?

or you could have the ability to create AAAA dyn dns records via the UI and for some reason I'm just blind.

Re: Duck DNS – free dynamic DNS hosted on AWS

#90

one could just pay a small yearly fee to register their domain with google and get easy/unlimited ddns.

You can also host your zone with Hurricane Electric and skip the part about paying a small yearly fee to Google.

there's no cost to google besides the registration fee, if it's your zone, you're paying that fee anyways. The only way to not pay a fee is to go through a free dyndns provider that you have to use a hostname off of their zone.
Post reply on HN