Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm way too far away from power on anything like this so I might be terribly wrong, but I imagine that cutting off SWIFT might convince other countries doing bad things to consider adhering to Russia's system, if they see the West willing to cut them off as well. You then get fragmentation and SWIFT losing some of its "soft power".
Russia already uses multiple alternative settlement systems with China, Iran, and few other buddies like Norko, and Belarus. > You then get fragmentation and SWIFT losing some of its "soft power". This already lost any power it had in 2014, because the threat of disconnection was wasted. An honestly, EU lost its face now to talk "soft power." Every foreign head of state going to meet EU bureaucrats will now look at t…
> can I rely on these people who threw out every treaty for a want of sleeping without a blanket?
Why isn't the US sending troops? Because the risk of escalation and nukes are unacceptable. In case you forgot, Europe also has nuclear powers and the risk of escalation is higher if the EU as an organization openly acts on more then soft power.
And as far as i know, only the US and the UK are ignoring a treaty to offer security to Ukraine.
Again, I'm not satisfied with the response so far, but what exactly are you suggesting so that EU bureaucrats don't lose their credibility?