Live data from Hacker News

Back to EU

adambird.com

81–90 of 110 posts

Re: Back to EU

#81
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What taxes are you talking about? Vennootschapsbelasting? I believe it is a reduced rate for all businesses below a certain revenue.

I really have trouble telling Dutch words from hand smash in keyboards. I love it.

And to think that Dutch is the closest somewhat-large language to English... (skipping Scots (often seen as a dialect) and Frisian (really small)).

Re: Back to EU

#82
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I really have trouble telling Dutch words from hand smash in keyboards. I love it.

My favorite is the word "angstschreeuw" (cry/shout of fear), which is the word with the most consecutive consonants in the Dutch dictionary.

"Grachtengordel" (canals) is great to practice pronunciation.

Re: Back to EU

#83

Why posted on the personal blog instead of the company site?

Because I wanted to express my genuinely personal opinion about the situation and the company blog isn't really the place for that. Appreciate that as CEO these lines are blurred but I endeavoured to show some understanding of boundaries by publishing in this way. We will be providing more formal documentation about how customers can transact with us through the new entity and take advantage of the new oversight.

Then it would be helpful to have a link to your company at the top of the post.

The article starts immediately talking about Cronofy (using "we"), without any indication to the reader what Cronofy is and how you are related to it. Just an introductory sentence along the lines of "As the CEO of Cronofy [link to company site] (we do XYZ) I wanted to share thoughts on..." would have kept me reading. Instead, I followed the link to https://adambird.com/ at the top and didn't find anything to help provide the missing context, so I just moved on.

To be clear, if this article was only intended to be addressed to a narrow audience that was already aware of all the context then it was probably fine, but for an outside observer like HN it's very unclear.

Re: Back to EU

#84
post #5

Interestingly the Dutch have been very keen to capture Tech companies (or at least make it an attractive place for employees). There is a low flat tax rate (30% iirc) for some years (was 5 when I last checked) if you're working in an "in-demand" sector, and tech is one of those sectors. This is somewhat controversial from what I understand, not all of the Dutch like it, and I understand why: it's not really very fair…

> This is somewhat controversial from what I understand, not all of the Dutch like it, and I understand why: it's not really very fair to give foreigners a tax break and not your own people.

Another way to look at it would be that these expats contribute to our economy and society without having cost us money in preparation (schooling etc.) So I think it's a win-win.

Re: Back to EU

#86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because I wanted to express my genuinely personal opinion about the situation and the company blog isn't really the place for that. Appreciate that as CEO these lines are blurred but I endeavoured to show some understanding of boundaries by publishing in this way. We will be providing more formal documentation about how customers can transact with us through the new entity and take advantage of the new oversight.

Then it would be helpful to have a link to your company at the top of the post. The article starts immediately talking about Cronofy (using "we"), without any indication to the reader what Cronofy is and how you are related to it. Just an introductory sentence along the lines of "As the CEO of Cronofy [link to company site] (we do XYZ) I wanted to share thoughts on..." would have kept me reading. Instead, I followed…

As a data point, I'm not personally aware of Cronofy in any way. It's not a name that rings any bells to me.

Though I very much agree with your sentiment about the dumb crap the UK has pulled, and the trajectory its on.

Re: Back to EU

#87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because I wanted to express my genuinely personal opinion about the situation and the company blog isn't really the place for that. Appreciate that as CEO these lines are blurred but I endeavoured to show some understanding of boundaries by publishing in this way. We will be providing more formal documentation about how customers can transact with us through the new entity and take advantage of the new oversight.

Because I wanted to express my genuinely personal opinion about the situation and the company blog isn't really the place for that The whole thing is about the company. Not washing.

It's legally dangerous to do that, mainly because (at least in the US) it can "pierce the veil". I know that British and Dutch laws operate very differently, but I'm pretty sure that there still needs to be a clear separation in certain cases (this is a reorganisation which is a legal tightrope).

Re: Back to EU

#88
post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why would the EU ever want us back? Really? By the time England's population becomes strongly in favour of rejoining, our economy will have been fairly trashed, we won't be a significant player, the EU will have done just fine without us for ages, why would they ever let a former member that caused a bunch of trouble, back in? What's in it for them? Also I'm not convinced England's population ever will be in strong f…

> Why would the EU ever want us back? It solves a lot of problems for Ireland, assuming Northern Ireland hasn't rejoined the Republic first.

My guess would be, a fair chance NI will join with the Republic. That'd solve a lot of problems really, wouldn't it? Perhaps a permanently more peaceful Ireland may result from Brexit, while a less peaceful Britain....

Re: Back to EU

#89
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why would the EU ever want us back? Really? By the time England's population becomes strongly in favour of rejoining, our economy will have been fairly trashed, we won't be a significant player, the EU will have done just fine without us for ages, why would they ever let a former member that caused a bunch of trouble, back in? What's in it for them? Also I'm not convinced England's population ever will be in strong f…

Twenty years is a long time, the way things will pan out is an open game. I think more realistic than a trashed economy will be a hyper-neoliberal free market economy with even huger discrepancies between the rich few and the vast majority of poor, with GM crops, terrible workers rights, masses of migrant workers without access to the welfare state, meaningless digital rights, housing and offices in London owned by t…

Sadly all you list sounds very plausible. Maybe in addition to a trashed economy!

Re: Back to EU

#90
post #5

Interestingly the Dutch have been very keen to capture Tech companies (or at least make it an attractive place for employees). There is a low flat tax rate (30% iirc) for some years (was 5 when I last checked) if you're working in an "in-demand" sector, and tech is one of those sectors. This is somewhat controversial from what I understand, not all of the Dutch like it, and I understand why: it's not really very fair…

You can make big(ger) tax break deals with the tax authority in the netherlands if you fork over enough money. Perhaps folks pay lip service to it being controversial, but fundamentally the cultural backdrop that stimulated the historical amassing of wealth has not changed much.
Post reply on HN