Live data from Hacker News

What if Bitcoin went to zero?

economist.com

81–84 of 84 posts

Re: What if Bitcoin went to zero?

#81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bitcoin mining hasn't relied on graphics cards in years. SHA2 calculations are highly amenable to ASIC speedups, so ASICs took over Bitcoin mining pretty early in its history.

I didn’t downvote you, but your point does not necessarily invalidate the point you responded to. The whale of cryptocurrencies more or less props up all of the smaller coins, which are relying on GPUs and even SSDs/HDDs in mining. It goes down, they could lose enough of value to suffer their own runaway effects, and crashes will make PC gaming and computing overall much more affordable.

That other cryptocurrencies would depreciate in the event of Bitcoin's dissapearance is a highly debateable point.

Re: What if Bitcoin went to zero?

#82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It might just overshoot zero and go to a negative value. 0n a long enought time line bitcoin, in its current form at least, will 100% be worthless. That day is when its cryptographic backbone is either broken or surpassed by computing capacity to break the public / private keys.

So you think the chain will be attacked and all the devs with trillions invested (at that point in the future) will be completely blindsided and not defend the network by soft/hardforking/etc? I completely disagree.

Your reply reads like a 'complete agreement' rather than a disagreement - as at that point in time you suggest, the chain ... will no longer be in its current form.

So yes, I completely agree with your agreement.

Re: What if Bitcoin went to zero?

#83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So you think the chain will be attacked and all the devs with trillions invested (at that point in the future) will be completely blindsided and not defend the network by soft/hardforking/etc? I completely disagree.

Your reply reads like a 'complete agreement' rather than a disagreement - as at that point in time you suggest, the chain ... will no longer be in its current form. So yes, I completely agree with your agreement.

>Your reply reads like a 'complete agreement' rather than a disagreement

Wrong, there have been a few soft forks already. You seem to not know the history of bitcoin or what makes bitcoin bitcoin. You need to do some studying before discussing this topic.

Post reply on HN