Live data from Hacker News

Amazon’s answer to delivery driver shortage: Pot smokers

latimes.com

81–90 of 285 posts

Re: Amazon’s answer to delivery driver shortage: Pot smokers

#81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One more is explaining age discrimination to youngsters. Especially over the damn zoom time video since they don’t show up for work.

Age discrimination goes both ways, it’s not just 40+ workers that experience it

I agree.

Re: Amazon’s answer to delivery driver shortage: Pot smokers

#82
post #76
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I haven’t met someone who knows that yet.

You haven't noticed meeting the ones who do.

But statistically the number of people who don’t know is enough to cause untold despair, injury, death and sadness. So fuck anyone for having the self propelled arrogance to make that decision on behalf of victims.

Re: Amazon’s answer to delivery driver shortage: Pot smokers

#83

I’m keeping my camera ready for when Snoop Dogg brings me my package.

When did HN start having such low quality comments?

What sort of intellectual dialog and witty repartee did you expect? I'm pretty sure that the guy at Amazon who decided to hire the potheads isn't going to win a Nobel.

Re: Amazon’s answer to delivery driver shortage: Pot smokers

#84
post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hopefully somebody introduces this. Weed stinks and people who smoke it outdoors are as much a nuisance as people who smoke cigarettes. Both should be legal but banned from any public places.

To be consistent we would have to ban cars for the same reason too. At least near where people live or work.

Also many perfumes and colognes. Some can be incredibly overwhelming.

Re: Amazon’s answer to delivery driver shortage: Pot smokers

#85
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And also clearly have never been high enough to realize that they are more likely to be super paranoid and going 10 miles under the speed limit than driving through a fence or running over children. It’s not at all comparable to being drunk.

That’s bullshit. Someone rolled their car into my front garden at 70+ mph in a 30 mph limit on it. The only good thing was it was at 3AM so there was no one around on a normally busy street to get wiped out. And your whole attitude of irrational justification of it says you’re probably not capable of making a rational judgement about whether or not you should drive.

Anecdote is not data.

Re: Amazon’s answer to delivery driver shortage: Pot smokers

#86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When did HN start having such low quality comments?

What sort of intellectual dialog and witty repartee did you expect? I'm pretty sure that the guy at Amazon who decided to hire the potheads isn't going to win a Nobel.

A debate about drug classification? An insight with data or maybe even an intelligent anecdote about the travails of hiring in modern day USA?

Your comment wouldn't even get points on Reddit, it might get a "lol" on twitter

Re: Amazon’s answer to delivery driver shortage: Pot smokers

#87
post #57

Some of the comments are assuming that all those who smoke pot are irresponsible or unable to do a job if they do smoke pot (this includes people who may only smoke at weekends/parties btw)

A larger portion of them are from experience of hiring and being around people who smoke it. I would not employ someone who does because of those people. I have horror stories a mile long. I know this is unpopular on internet news sites but I assure you that your social reputation isn’t that great if you smoke the stuff generally and that’s not going to change because of the propensity of people to be unreliable or d…

Hmm. This is a tough one. Do you think those people come off unreliable because they use cannabis, or would it be more likely that they, for example, suffer from a(n undiagnosed) medical condition such as PTSD or ADHD, which tend to make them a bit unreliable at times, but which cannabis treats so that the person is in fact more reliable when constantly high?

Re: Amazon’s answer to delivery driver shortage: Pot smokers

#88
post #31
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We don't regulate alcohol use, and it's quite a lot more destructive for some. I don't get the specific puritanism for pot. Edit: Regulate as in drug testing for past use in an employment context, like what the story is talking about.

I think you have it upside-down. It's tobacco and alcohol that have special treatment, not pot. My main guess for that special treatment is merely that tobacco and alcohol were global when we started taking care about global health issues, so we left them, but banned any newcomer

There are plenty of psychoactive substances on the shelves of any major supermarket and most of the stuff is completely unregulated.

How is coffee different from tobacco? How is nutmeg or saffron different from drugs? How about artificial flavonoid—xanthine concoctions such as Red Bull?

Re: Amazon’s answer to delivery driver shortage: Pot smokers

#89
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That’s bullshit. Someone rolled their car into my front garden at 70+ mph in a 30 mph limit on it. The only good thing was it was at 3AM so there was no one around on a normally busy street to get wiped out. And your whole attitude of irrational justification of it says you’re probably not capable of making a rational judgement about whether or not you should drive.

Anecdote is not data.

That’s also bullshit. This went into the stats here. Thus is data.

Re: Amazon’s answer to delivery driver shortage: Pot smokers

#90
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A larger portion of them are from experience of hiring and being around people who smoke it. I would not employ someone who does because of those people. I have horror stories a mile long. I know this is unpopular on internet news sites but I assure you that your social reputation isn’t that great if you smoke the stuff generally and that’s not going to change because of the propensity of people to be unreliable or d…

Hmm. This is a tough one. Do you think those people come off unreliable because they use cannabis, or would it be more likely that they, for example, suffer from a(n undiagnosed) medical condition such as PTSD or ADHD, which tend to make them a bit unreliable at times, but which cannabis treats so that the person is in fact more reliable when constantly high?

I knew some of them before they started using it. It’s almost entirely the cannabis. Including the dude now in psychiatric care after it kicked his schizophrenia hard.

Everyone was promoted it as harmless. It’s not. I’m seeing lives wrecked.

And yes I know alcohol is bad. But I see less long term damage from that as most people seem to grow out of alcoholism I have know. Cannabis not so much - it becomes the primary thing they live for and around. All conversation ends up on it.

Post reply on HN