Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ok so you’re saying: « Making prisoners read books is racist ». Don’t you realize that this statement is either completely delusional or some form of woke nonsensical Newspeak? Let me recap: This initiative only has upsides, no downsides. And it has no race distinction. And it benefits people across the board, from people of color to white people. And in absolute terms it will benefit to more people of color than whi…
> This initiative only has upsides, no downsides. Theoretically, it might release someone who the rest of the world would have been better off keeping in jail.
Brazil prisoners reading books to shorten their sentences (2020)
81–87 of 87 posts
Re: Brazil prisoners reading books to shorten their sentences (2020)
#82Earlier quoted context omitted.
> This initiative only has upsides, no downsides. Theoretically, it might release someone who the rest of the world would have been better off keeping in jail.
This guy got out of Austrian prison because he could write readably, up to the point of being published and gaining a lot of support from the usual literary luvvies. (I read the book, it was way too self-pitying. Written well, but the stench of "everyone was so mean to me and I am such a victim" was unbearable.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Unterweger He went on to murder a few more women before being caught an…
Re: Brazil prisoners reading books to shorten their sentences (2020)
#83This could be a bit discriminatory, Brazil has a high analphabetism rate, it will be worst in prison, I suppose. The ones who can't read should be offered courses and maybe start with easy comics.
> analphabetism I've never heard that word before. It's a synonym for illiteracy.
Spanish - analfabeto
Portuguese - analfabeto
French - analphabète
Italian - analfabeta
German - Analphabet
Romanian - analfabet
Polish - analfabeta
Re: Brazil prisoners reading books to shorten their sentences (2020)
#84Earlier quoted context omitted.
Paulo Freire plagiarized the Laubach method, created by the protestant missionary Frank Charles Laubach. The method was copied by marxists ideologists in Brazil's Pernambuco, emphasizing the class struggle. The author of these other primers was Paulo Freire, who lent his name to the "new methodology" as if it were his own.
It is important to notice that this claim is highly disputed. Paulo Freire and his methods are frequently attacked by far-right politicians and activists in Brazil, and this information is definitely politically biased.
Re: Brazil prisoners reading books to shorten their sentences (2020)
#85Earlier quoted context omitted.
Relatively easy to find, given that the name is quite distinctive. E.g., https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S02727... . That article doesn't seem to be conclusive. I, however, doubt the value of bibliotherapy. I don't see how it would work.
I think a major takeaway from reading is to see inside the mind of another person. That's something that I suspect most criminals do badly, since crime, especially violent crime, requires the person to NOT understand the impact of their actions on others. Sociopaths don't care, but they commit the vast minority of crime. Getting the other criminals to appreciate more perspectives than just their own might be very hel…
Re: Brazil prisoners reading books to shorten their sentences (2020)
#86Re: Brazil prisoners reading books to shorten their sentences (2020)
#87Earlier quoted context omitted.
This guy got out of Austrian prison because he could write readably, up to the point of being published and gaining a lot of support from the usual literary luvvies. (I read the book, it was way too self-pitying. Written well, but the stench of "everyone was so mean to me and I am such a victim" was unbearable.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Unterweger He went on to murder a few more women before being caught an…
Situation is different here. We talk about reading books not writing them. And of a maximum of reducing by 48days per year, so a 13% reduction of the sentence of people read books continuously, not about releasing people that wouldn’t have been released anyway.
I'm struggling to see why you think that makes a difference.
The only obvious difference is that reading a book is much easier than writing one, which would tend to aggravate the problem of letting people out of jail when they should be in it.