Live data from Hacker News

Google Tried To Buy Color For $200 Million. Color Said No.

techcrunch.com

81–90 of 124 posts

Re: Google Tried To Buy Color For $200 Million. Color Said No.

#81
post #79

For me, the brilliant idea behind Color, (which they did absolutely not realize in their app), is the idea of an elastic social network. In real like, friendship isn't binary. It's a scale of how close we are, what we talk about, what we share in common, etc. If you came up with a social network that would figure out who your friends are based on how often you talked, hung out, what you talked about etc., I'd call yo…

[deleted]

Re: Google Tried To Buy Color For $200 Million. Color Said No.

#82

I might be the only person in the universe who thinks Color is a fantastic idea, but not because it's trying to be an uber-cool new social network. Location-based photo sharing is an incredible idea. When I'm at an event -- say, a concert -- there are hundreds of people around me taking lots of different pictures. I want those pictures, but I don't know any of those people. Imagine going to a venue, not bringing a ca…

[deleted]

Re: Google Tried To Buy Color For $200 Million. Color Said No.

#83

I might be the only person in the universe who thinks Color is a fantastic idea, but not because it's trying to be an uber-cool new social network. Location-based photo sharing is an incredible idea. When I'm at an event -- say, a concert -- there are hundreds of people around me taking lots of different pictures. I want those pictures, but I don't know any of those people. Imagine going to a venue, not bringing a ca…

Whether there's good money in solving this sort of problem is another question -- but sorting through shared photos at events is a surprisingly hard problem, as I learned recently. I attended Anime Expo 2011 in costume. Over the course of the two days I was there, I probably had at least 100 people stop me for photos -- not unexpected with thousands of people walking around carrying cameras. I attended a photo shoot…

Also I should add, you might want to take pictures of yourself or your friends in the foreground. That's what personalizes a photo for MOST people. imho.

Re: Google Tried To Buy Color For $200 Million. Color Said No.

#85
post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Whether there's good money in solving this sort of problem is another question -- but sorting through shared photos at events is a surprisingly hard problem, as I learned recently. I attended Anime Expo 2011 in costume. Over the course of the two days I was there, I probably had at least 100 people stop me for photos -- not unexpected with thousands of people walking around carrying cameras. I attended a photo shoot…

Also I should add, you might want to take pictures of yourself or your friends in the foreground. That's what personalizes a photo for MOST people. imho.

I thought of that as well, but surprisingly, I only got about half a dozen requests to take pictures with people out of the ~hundred total. Going by what I saw of other people being photographed, this was probably typical.

Re: Google Tried To Buy Color For $200 Million. Color Said No.

#86

I might be the only person in the universe who thinks Color is a fantastic idea, but not because it's trying to be an uber-cool new social network. Location-based photo sharing is an incredible idea. When I'm at an event -- say, a concert -- there are hundreds of people around me taking lots of different pictures. I want those pictures, but I don't know any of those people. Imagine going to a venue, not bringing a ca…

I love going to gigs, but.. I prefer to remember my experience of what happened, which is not something that can be caught on camera.

(note 1; I know I'm not the target audience for any social network)

(note 2; I really dislike the fact that the audiences to gigs are just filled with people holding up their mobile. Instead of trying to get a pic to put on FB, why don't you try enjoy actually being there?!)

Re: Google Tried To Buy Color For $200 Million. Color Said No.

#87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If the product was released differently, it very likely could have been successful. It seems to me that once they got all that VC funding, they were desperate to release something to prove their worth. But, since their product depends on tons of people all using it in a geographically tight area, it crashed and burned. I think had they started releasing at events (ala twitter @ sxsw), they could have had some success…

Yeah, it could have been a cool thing-- like "This Conference with Color" or at certain trendy clubs. Get some celebs on there too.

"SXSW... now in Color"

That sounds like a great co-branding opportunity. Color could also sell/host conference services such as preloading conference-related photos/ads or providing additional Color photographers to "augment" the conference's Color photos when the app's adoption is still low.

Re: Google Tried To Buy Color For $200 Million. Color Said No.

#88

More likely: Google offered a few bucks for Color and millions if they met milestones 1, 2, 3...; Color knew they couldn't so they turned it down.

Good point. $200 million in cash or stock and how many milestones you have to hit are significant factors.

Re: Google Tried To Buy Color For $200 Million. Color Said No.

#89
post #7
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I too feel like there something there people think has value but the average person doesn't see. But maybe there is nothing and this is really as irrational as it looks.

Agreed. Either Color has value, or it doesn't.

Haha. Like saying I have 50/50 chance to win the lottery. I either win, or I don't.

Re: Google Tried To Buy Color For $200 Million. Color Said No.

#90

I might be the only person in the universe who thinks Color is a fantastic idea, but not because it's trying to be an uber-cool new social network. Location-based photo sharing is an incredible idea. When I'm at an event -- say, a concert -- there are hundreds of people around me taking lots of different pictures. I want those pictures, but I don't know any of those people. Imagine going to a venue, not bringing a ca…

I love going to gigs, but.. I prefer to remember my experience of what happened, which is not something that can be caught on camera. (note 1; I know I'm not the target audience for any social network) (note 2; I really dislike the fact that the audiences to gigs are just filled with people holding up their mobile. Instead of trying to get a pic to put on FB, why don't you try enjoy actually being there?!)

Second that. Be present. Live in the moment. A few choice photos are fine, but don't let the need to document and fb-brag consume your life. Just live it.
Post reply on HN