Live data from Hacker News

Why yo momma won’t use Google+ (and why that thrills me to no end)

scobleizer.com

81–90 of 113 posts

Re: Why yo momma won’t use Google+ (and why that thrills me to no end)

#81

To bold text you surround that text with asterisks. Like this* GEEKY ALERT! Italicize? Put underscores around the text. Strikeout? Put hyphens around it.* Really? The most trivial markdown syntax is for the Geeks only? I don't want to live in that world; that sounds like a nightmare of truly incompetent users.

I can't stand this. Asterisks in the geek world denote actions, not bold. Underlines are frequently used for computing purposes. How is Markdown in any way friendly to geeks?

Re: Why yo momma won’t use Google+ (and why that thrills me to no end)

#83
I must say I disagree with this post. Based on how my "normal" friends use facebook, I'm impressed to the lengths they can go just because they love the product, or because it's trendy. Many non-geeks today like to think of themselves as computer savvy, and I think little tricks like the bold and italics will seem cool for them and not "geeky" or "hard". But that's just a circle of hipster twentysomethings.

In the end, if your mom doesn't understand the internet, she'll go to what she hears is popular and not what's simple. And if the hipsters join the bandwagon many people will follow independently of wether they understand it or not (I find this to be especially true for twitter, where a lot of people I know joined because a lot of others were using it, but they never really understood the service).

Re: Why yo momma won’t use Google+ (and why that thrills me to no end)

#85
post #21

I read an interview with a record executive a long time ago and he answered the question, "How do you find the next big thing?" "That's pretty easy," he said, "I just look for something that parents will hate." That this is a successful strategy is self-evident. (American) kids want to differentiate themselves from their parents and will pay money to do so. They'll probably latch on in some form to anything as long a…

> I think it's a safe bet that the social networking site that replaces Facebook will have fewer features, be ugly, be more difficult to use, and have no redeeming qualities other than nobody's parents are going to participate in it, and kids will identify with it as the cool thing for that reason.

Ugly or not, it will happen. Since human time is limited, a smart social strategy is all about identifying the right "circle" of people you want to join, and then performing activities that increase the chances of your interacting with people from that circle while reducing the chances of your interacting with people from outside.

What this means is that even when your social site is small (compared to say Facebook), if you have all the right people in it (meaning people with high social favorability factor), you will succeed.

Some people make the mistake of assuming that the larger their site is, the better off they are. It's not only about quantity, but also about quality. Low quality eventually leads to decline in quantity by driving people away. That's what happened to MySpace and what will happen to Facebook.

Re: Why yo momma won’t use Google+ (and why that thrills me to no end)

#86
hmmm, i don't know if scobleizer is a benefit to a product or the kiss of death ...

for me Google+ is missing key features, like a decent messaging system, and events ... it's also lacking a feature to link up with similar interest groups ... On first impression, i'm not really convinced

Re: Why yo momma won’t use Google+ (and why that thrills me to no end)

#87
This is the most braindead review of the service that I have read. Any social network goes through the ghost town - early adopters - your mom stage, When your mom arrives, you can't say "fuck" anymore, and so you feel the need to move to another service. Add to this the copious amounts of wall-spam generated in Facebook and a lot of people are excited about Plus. Particularly because Circles is central to the service, even when your mom finally arrives, you'll still theoretically be able to let your mouth off. That's why this thing might have legs. Not because some nebulous and self-congratulatory definition of "geek" would theoretically like it.

Re: Why yo momma won’t use Google+ (and why that thrills me to no end)

#88

hmmm, i don't know if scobleizer is a benefit to a product or the kiss of death ... for me Google+ is missing key features, like a decent messaging system, and events ... it's also lacking a feature to link up with similar interest groups ... On first impression, i'm not really convinced

_like a decent messaging system_

Well they do have gmail, google talk/chat and hangouts. Is another messaging system really needed?

_and events_

This I think I agree on, and is something I've been thinking about as wel.

Re: Why yo momma won’t use Google+ (and why that thrills me to no end)

#89

How do you bold and italicize on Facebook? I'm not aware of the ability. Personally I think having a Word interface for a textarea is pretty darn geeky. Using Markdown or some other markup language is better solution since those who don't know just won't use it.

Facebook Notes support simple HTML. You can't use bold or italics anywhere else, to my knowledge.

You can in chat. Pseudo-markdown, * for italic, _ for underline.

Re: Why yo momma won’t use Google+ (and why that thrills me to no end)

#90
post #21

I read an interview with a record executive a long time ago and he answered the question, "How do you find the next big thing?" "That's pretty easy," he said, "I just look for something that parents will hate." That this is a successful strategy is self-evident. (American) kids want to differentiate themselves from their parents and will pay money to do so. They'll probably latch on in some form to anything as long a…

> "I just look for something that parents will hate." That this is a successful strategy is self-evident.

Quoting Joshua Ellis's piece on the grim meathook future:

> Feeding poor people is useful tech,

> but it’s not very sexy

> and it won’t get you on the cover of Wired.

> Talk about it too much

> and you sound like an earnest hippie.

> So nobody wants to do that.

> They want to make cell phones

> that can scan your personal measurements

> and send them real-time

> to potential sex partners.

> Because, you know,

> the fucking Japanese teenagers love it,

> and Japanese teenagers

> are clearly the smartest people on the planet.

The full text is at http://zenarchery.com/?page_id=1180. It's short. Read it.

Post reply on HN