Earlier quoted context omitted.
Other than made it warmer and more acidic, added a bunch of plastic garbage and removed a significant percentage of its inhabitants, yeah I guess not much.
> removed a significant percentage of its inhabitants I was actually curious if anyone could help answer the following: (a) how one would define inhabitant (including bacteria?) (b) what the net %age change actually would be given a suitable choice of (a)
Humans have displaced over 90% of all terrestrial vertebrate biomass (land animals with a backbone).
http://peakoilbarrel.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Terrestr...
Most of the human + livestock biomass is utterly dependent on Haber-Bosch process derived nitrogen fertiliser, produced via nonrenewable natural gas (methane, a fossil fuel).