Earlier quoted context omitted.
All of them, sadly. Outlook is probably the craziest of all, adding the a /16 of Hetzner, because 1 IP sent spam.
Wait but if microsoft completely blocks a cloud provider wrt. any mail sending this is a form of illegal hindering of competition as far as I can tell.
Protonmail was down
81–83 of 83 posts
Re: Protonmail was down
#82Earlier quoted context omitted.
Super unusual. I've never encountered the issue before or since.
Found this thread http://openbsd-archive.7691.n7.nabble.com/OT-protonmail-mail... Someone was complaining that mail sent from ProtonMail was unreadable to them. Turned out to be because of base64 encoding. Which is an RFC standard. However, several people in the thread insist that this is a problem. Theo de Raadt, the founder and leader of OpenBSD says in the thread: > Maybe it should be blocked. Then the users there…
It seems that that mailing list is "Plain text, 72 characters per line" by policy.
Re: Protonmail was down
#83Great timing /s. I switched to PM on Friday. I love the combination of features though. I pay for pro so I get catch-all email on custom domains. Really helps to see who sells your info and secure storage and no advertising with good web-mail client are obviously major selling points too. I wish them luck resolving the situation.
Catch-all is nice but I came from the self-hosting world where I could also customise the from address when I reply to a catch-all email. Protonmail only lets you reply from a non-catch-all address, so you end up leaking your "private" address if you ever reply. That's my only real complaint about Protonmail. I requested this feature but I doubt it's high up their priority list.
Why not use a relay service like [https://relay.firefox.com] or [https://owlmail.io]?
Since most senders aren't using PGP/E2EE your effective security risk is equivalent. Plus you can still discover address misuse/sale/leakage, disable addresses at will, and your privacy increases.