Live data from Hacker News

Nvidia announces Jetson Nano 2GB, a single board computer

medium.com

81–90 of 205 posts

Re: Nvidia announces Jetson Nano 2GB, a single board computer

#81

I have a Jetson nano. It's a nice thing for what it is, and the price. But, the software misses the mark by a lot. It's still based on Ubuntu 18.04. Want python later than 3.6? Not in the box. A lot of python modules need compiling, and the cpu is what you'd expect. Good for what it is, bad for compiling large numbers or packages. They run a fancy modern desktop based on the Ubuntu one. Sure, it's Nvidia, gotta be fl…

Yes, NVidia should stop tying their Jetson hardware to specific Ubuntu releases.

Instead they should release drivers that work with any Linux distribution (for example Debian, which is now broken because of USB issues).

Re: Nvidia announces Jetson Nano 2GB, a single board computer

#83

I have a Jetson nano. It's a nice thing for what it is, and the price. But, the software misses the mark by a lot. It's still based on Ubuntu 18.04. Want python later than 3.6? Not in the box. A lot of python modules need compiling, and the cpu is what you'd expect. Good for what it is, bad for compiling large numbers or packages. They run a fancy modern desktop based on the Ubuntu one. Sure, it's Nvidia, gotta be fl…

> Want python later than 3.6? Not in the box.

The more I use linux (and I'v been for almost 15 years), the more strongly believe that using what the Linux distros provide as a development toolchain is an antipattern. Use separate toolchains with SDKs separate from your /usr instead.

> Good for what it is, bad for compiling large numbers or packages.

at worst you can

    docker run -it aarch64/ubuntu 
on your desktop and compile your stuff there.

Re: Nvidia announces Jetson Nano 2GB, a single board computer

#84
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Woow HUGE thanks!

Forgot the most important one - power it by using power cable that came with it and the 5V _2A_ adapter. It will kernel panic at random places if you power it from the USB port.

Oh geez. How did you even figure this one out?

Re: Nvidia announces Jetson Nano 2GB, a single board computer

#85

I have a Jetson nano. It's a nice thing for what it is, and the price. But, the software misses the mark by a lot. It's still based on Ubuntu 18.04. Want python later than 3.6? Not in the box. A lot of python modules need compiling, and the cpu is what you'd expect. Good for what it is, bad for compiling large numbers or packages. They run a fancy modern desktop based on the Ubuntu one. Sure, it's Nvidia, gotta be fl…

> Want python later than 3.6? Not in the box. The more I use linux (and I'v been for almost 15 years), the more strongly believe that using what the Linux distros provide as a development toolchain is an antipattern. Use separate toolchains with SDKs separate from your /usr instead. > Good for what it is, bad for compiling large numbers or packages. at worst you can docker run -it aarch64/ubuntu on your desktop and c…

u can use virtual environments for that

Re: Nvidia announces Jetson Nano 2GB, a single board computer

#86
What about a commitment to providing customers with proper hardware schematics and detailed datasheets? (yes, even if the board itself isn't opensource)

I lost faith in using raspberry pi 4s because the foundation is very tight-lipped. Want to know why your board is behaving weirdly, or whether the behavior is expected or a result of a defect? TOUGH LUCK. You'll have to rely on outdated forum posts, SO answers, and (if you're really lucky) the good mood of the engineer monitoring these sites.

I'd rather stick to building for a well-understood but expensive platform like x86 than undocumented black boxes.

Re: Nvidia announces Jetson Nano 2GB, a single board computer

#88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Want python later than 3.6? Not in the box. The more I use linux (and I'v been for almost 15 years), the more strongly believe that using what the Linux distros provide as a development toolchain is an antipattern. Use separate toolchains with SDKs separate from your /usr instead. > Good for what it is, bad for compiling large numbers or packages. at worst you can docker run -it aarch64/ubuntu on your desktop and c…

u can use virtual environments for that

Perhaps virtual environments should be the default on Linux distributions?

Re: Nvidia announces Jetson Nano 2GB, a single board computer

#89
post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can update it to Ubuntu 20.04 pretty easily. (using a Xavier as a desktop with that) If you don't need CUDA, you can outright use regular Fedora, which uses nouveau. (no reclocking issues or such on Tegra)

If you don't need CUDA, then save money, heat, and support issues associated with a second-string product and just get a rpi4. The entire point of the Jetson is that there's a non sucky GPU that can do AI at the Edge.

Perhaps we would be better off if NVidia just made GPUs for the RPi ...

Re: Nvidia announces Jetson Nano 2GB, a single board computer

#90

I have a Jetson nano. It's a nice thing for what it is, and the price. But, the software misses the mark by a lot. It's still based on Ubuntu 18.04. Want python later than 3.6? Not in the box. A lot of python modules need compiling, and the cpu is what you'd expect. Good for what it is, bad for compiling large numbers or packages. They run a fancy modern desktop based on the Ubuntu one. Sure, it's Nvidia, gotta be fl…

Can you not trivially update all these things though? Like how big of a deal is it really? Or are you stuck using their specific distribution, and their distribution can't be updated to a more recent Ubuntu and python?
Post reply on HN