Live data from Hacker News

Derek Sivers and the Art of Enough

brendancahill.io

81–84 of 84 posts

Re: Derek Sivers and the Art of Enough

#81
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Different advice for different circumstances. Do you get upset when elite athletes talk about the importance of avoiding overtraining, when they have already become elite?

Apples and oranges my friend. Being elite and overtraining are orthogonal. By definition, overtraining is pushing your body too far too fast. No one can train for a 100 mile race by doing 3 50 mile training runs in a week. That's not how physiology works. Discipline and lots of hard work can help you be elite, but overtraining is never good. Never.

> Being elite and overtraining are orthogonal.

Not really - it can take a serious lifter weeks to recover from a competition deadlift whereas a new lifter can recover in 1-2 days.

Re: Derek Sivers and the Art of Enough

#82
post #78

It's weird to come to my favorite forum, and see my name in the title of a post. It's weirder to read comments claiming to know about my personal life and motivations, though they're all wrong. (Both the good and the bad.) The public me is not me - https://sivers.org/publicu - so I don't feel a great need to correct the errors here. But thanks (tw04, lukego, marcinzm, s_a_p) for the reminder that anything I do can be…

[deleted]

Re: Derek Sivers and the Art of Enough

#83
post #51
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wikipedia disagrees: >Derek Sivers transferred ownership of his company to a charitable remainder unitrust for music education, and had the trust sell it to Disc Makers. This agreement requires the trust to pay Sivers 5% of the trust's value annually (hypothetically $1,100,000 pretax, based on a sale price of $22 million as reported by Sivers)[4] until death, while upon death the remainder will ultimately go to chari…

He also acquired a second nationality, renounced US citizenship, and moved to a country that doesn't tax foreign sourced passive income. It's the most extreme example I've seen of planning your whole life around tax optimization. Understandable though if you've read his book because he's had big problems with the IRS in the past and probably really wanted to show them his "FU money."

(I'd just like to acknowledge that my parent comment is pretty lousy. I don't know Derek and I'm making assumptions about his motives. I feel like it's fair game after his article "Why I gave my company to charity [1]" but I'm not proud of casting aspersions on internet celebrities. I have a jaded view of philanthropy and philanthropists that may be totally off in this case.)

[1] https://sivers.org/trust

Re: Derek Sivers and the Art of Enough

#84
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They reduced the scope of new ones but leave old ones alone? Seems like it should apply to all or none.

Charitable remainder trusts are setup as irrevocable, if properly drafted. It would be difficult to equitably unwind them after the fact. Changing how CRUTs are treated ex-post facto would also raise doubts about how Roth IRAs will be treated. There's already people who don't trust that the federal government will keep those tax free.

There are all sorts of decisions made based partially on taxes that the government later changes going forward. And those changes cause a ton of issues. Just seems like should all be one way or the other.
Post reply on HN