81–90 of 235 posts
From the cherry-picked conversation section of the research paper [1]. > Human: Hi! > Bot: Hi! How are you? I'm a vegan, so I don't eat any animal products. Even AI vegans reinforcing stereotypes of being overly-forthcoming. [1] - https://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.13637.pdf
The only vegans you ever know to be vegans are those who bother to tell you, so it shouldn’t be surprising.
How can facebook turn a dumpster fire like reddit in a bot that response with more empathy than a human? Didn't Facebook just merge all fb messenger and whatsapp data and trained a NN on the new chat db?
Moderation, partitioning of interests into subreddits, and the existence of downvotes go a long way to reeling in the worst things about online discussions.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hi there. One of the original authors of the BlenderBot paper here. This cocohub website is not what we released. It appears that cocohub has removed our safety layer and provided other modifications to the bot. We released our model open source, along with specific instructions on interacting with it safely: https://parl.ai/projects/recipes/ It's important to note that dialogue safety is a very important and nuanced…
Hi stephenroller, I posted it as is (without the bad words filter). I also think it's very clear the model reflects the training data. And also kudos and thanks for releasing the code along with the paper. I'm obviously not claiming this a bot by facebook just research made accessible. let me know if you'd like to amend any of the texts next to it to make it any clearer. (just tried to properly credit the creators)
What i really wonder is why they trained it on Reddit data, not on their own datasets?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hi stephenroller, I posted it as is (without the bad words filter). I also think it's very clear the model reflects the training data. And also kudos and thanks for releasing the code along with the paper. I'm obviously not claiming this a bot by facebook just research made accessible. let me know if you'd like to amend any of the texts next to it to make it any clearer. (just tried to properly credit the creators)
Hi there, thanks for asking! It's very cool to make research more accessible. Would you be able to rename your experience to "Modified Small BlenderBot without Safety Layer"? And I think it’d be helpful to call out what changes you made when you say it’s adapted from our research.
Blog post: https://ai.facebook.com/blog/state-of-the-art-open-source-ch... Paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.13637.pdf Open Source: https://parl.ai/projects/recipes/ Ask us anything, the Facebook team behind it is happy to answer questions here.
How do you feel about this probably being most used by bad actors trying to screw with society and elections?
Blog post: https://ai.facebook.com/blog/state-of-the-art-open-source-ch... Paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.13637.pdf Open Source: https://parl.ai/projects/recipes/ Ask us anything, the Facebook team behind it is happy to answer questions here.
How consistent is the bot? Will it answer the same question phrased differently with the same opinion/fact/feeling?
As far as facts go, we also fine-tuned the model on the Wizard of Wikipedia task (https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.01241), which helps improve its knowledgeability. Again, it still isn't perfect.
Facebook Blog post with more information and longer chat session example: https://ai.facebook.com/blog/state-of-the-art-open-source-ch...
From the cherry-picked conversation section of the research paper [1]. > Human: Hi! > Bot: Hi! How are you? I'm a vegan, so I don't eat any animal products. Even AI vegans reinforcing stereotypes of being overly-forthcoming. [1] - https://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.13637.pdf
Just wait until bot uses /r/archlinux as learning material.
> AI: I can't connect to the wifi.