Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Fed does not set the budget, and is independent of the three branches of government, that's true, but... > The Federal Reserve System is an independent government institution that has private aspects. The System is not a private organization and does not operate for the purpose of making a profit. From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structure_of_the_Federal_Reser...
Uh what? Fed = Monetary policy == Make sure money can flow "appropriately" Government = Fiscal Policy == "Who gets money" I don't know how your quote is relevant at all.
Fed to inject $1.5T to prevent ‘unusual disruptions’ in markets
81–90 of 367 posts
Re: Fed to inject $1.5T to prevent ‘unusual disruptions’ in markets
#82Earlier quoted context omitted.
Often this type of action is not the government spending that level of money with nothing in return. Generally it is buying an asset it intends to sell later (often at a profit).
For sure. People still get up in arms about the 2008 bank bailout without realizing that it ended up resulting in a $121B profit to the government: https://projects.propublica.org/bailout/
Re: Fed to inject $1.5T to prevent ‘unusual disruptions’ in markets
#83$1.5T to bail out wall street? Sure!
Re: Fed to inject $1.5T to prevent ‘unusual disruptions’ in markets
#84Nobody is asking anything about funds now. But so many seems to be angry about healthcare for all. A universal health care can survive this pandemic and also others. This is unbelievable
But don't worry! Joe Biden has guaranteed he'd veto such an act even if it got through the house and senate.
Re: Fed to inject $1.5T to prevent ‘unusual disruptions’ in markets
#85"inject 1.5t" by that do they mean a 1.5t panic bailout for wall street? how can we find 1.5t in the budget but no money for universal healthcare, student loan forgiveness, ubi etc. The markets wouldn't be so important if there were a safety net.
Re: Fed to inject $1.5T to prevent ‘unusual disruptions’ in markets
#86Earlier quoted context omitted.
But don't worry! Joe Biden has guaranteed he'd veto such an act even if it got through the house and senate.
this is a very disingenuous read of that interview.
> It comes to your desk. Do you veto it?
he replied with
> I would veto anything that delays providing the security and the certainty of healthcare being available now. If they got that through in by some miracle or there`s an epiphany that occurred and some miracle occurred that said, OK, it`s passed. Then you got to look at the cost.
Unlike on hackernews politician's statements shouldn't be read charitably and in the best light possible because not saying "no" is a clear signal to a lot of the folks listening to the interview. I think reading it in the light of "yes" is fair, but he at least waffled a lot more than was warranted.
1. http://www.msnbc.com/transcripts/the-last-word/2020-03-09
Re: Fed to inject $1.5T to prevent ‘unusual disruptions’ in markets
#87Earlier quoted context omitted.
Folks. Companies listed on the stock market hire average folks who need the money to provide for their spouses and kids. Companies that provide staples to you like food and gas and transportation and medical supplies. These are the companies you are actively shorting. Think about that. This isn’t the same as 2008.
Company's welfare is somewhat connected to their stock price, but it's a really weak relation. The stock market is mostly a gambling simulator that runs beside the economy as it's own little micro-economy - this doesn't make it worthless but it does make this sort of a statement ring really hollow.
Re: Fed to inject $1.5T to prevent ‘unusual disruptions’ in markets
#88Re: Fed to inject $1.5T to prevent ‘unusual disruptions’ in markets
#89Wait for it. Next week stock buybacks will be all over the news. I bet AT&T will be leading the charge.
Re: Fed to inject $1.5T to prevent ‘unusual disruptions’ in markets
#90Earlier quoted context omitted.
Folks. Companies listed on the stock market hire average folks who need the money to provide for their spouses and kids. Companies that provide staples to you like food and gas and transportation and medical supplies. These are the companies you are actively shorting. Think about that. This isn’t the same as 2008.
Company's welfare is somewhat connected to their stock price, but it's a really weak relation. The stock market is mostly a gambling simulator that runs beside the economy as it's own little micro-economy - this doesn't make it worthless but it does make this sort of a statement ring really hollow.