Earlier quoted context omitted.
My concern in these services is, at what point in the future does your DNA get weaponized against you? When do you get declined for health insurance, or have jacked up premiums, because the insurance company bought a report from 23andMe that says you have a predisposition to expensive disease ? My DNA isn't a secret, but I don't yet feel comfortable voluntarily handing it over to be indexed by a for profit company th…
> When do you get declined for health insurance, or have jacked up premiums, because the insurance company bought a report from 23andMe that says you have a predisposition to expensive disease? US federal law prohibits this [1]. [1] https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/primer/testing/discrimination
23andMe licenses its own drug compound to Spanish firm Almirall
81–82 of 82 posts
Re: 23andMe licenses its own drug compound to Spanish firm Almirall
#82Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I stopped thinking of my DNA as a secret when I realized how impossible it is to keep other people from having access to it. The idea isn't 100% security or nothing, but to make it harder for the data to be exploited. Lots of our personal data isn't a well kept secret, but I also don't give it to any company that asks for it, unlike my shoe size.
The harder it is to exploit the data, the harder it is to do basic genetic research. There's a fundamental dilemma there. If you don't want to share your data with research organizations, so be it. But calling other people suckers for voluntarily sharing their data means you'd rather live in a world where scientific and medical advancement are stunted. That's like called open source contributors suckers, as it gives…
Genetic research is important but pick the lab carefully.