Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thank you for building leaflet. It (and scrapy) are how I wound up finding the house I live in now - a quirky, dirt cheap cottage I'd never have taken note of without the tools to filter and visualize a whole country's listings.
You wouldn't happen to have the tools to still do that, would you?
OpenLayers
81–89 of 89 posts
Re: OpenLayers
#82Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thank you for building leaflet. It (and scrapy) are how I wound up finding the house I live in now - a quirky, dirt cheap cottage I'd never have taken note of without the tools to filter and visualize a whole country's listings.
What country and how did you get their listings?
Re: OpenLayers
#83Re: OpenLayers
#84We use OpenLayers at our company. We are building an interactive map with a bunch of tools for measuring distance, calculating routes, drawing features, displaying diagrams right on top of the map, and OpenLayers is doing wonders for us. It has a steep learning curve but once you grasp the fundamentals, you can figure out how to do all kinds of magic tricks with it.
Re: OpenLayers
#85Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks for sharing! One more curiosity - what PNG compression tool was used and how long did it take to crunch 216GB to 17GB? I'm surprised it didn't crash.
I didn't compress an actual image from 216GB to 17GB. Instead, I created the highest resolution image already as a set of tiles (each one 5000x10000 px). Then I tiled them further in two additional zoom levels, until I got 4x8 square tiles of 1250x1250px. From there I worked backwards merging chunks of 2x2 tiles. The figure 217 GB comes from the cumulative size of all the pandas DataFrames containing the whole datase…
Re: OpenLayers
#86Re: OpenLayers
#87We use OpenLayers at our company. We are building an interactive map with a bunch of tools for measuring distance, calculating routes, drawing features, displaying diagrams right on top of the map, and OpenLayers is doing wonders for us. It has a steep learning curve but once you grasp the fundamentals, you can figure out how to do all kinds of magic tricks with it.
What's your company?
Re: OpenLayers
#88Leaflet author here! Just wanted to note that if you haven't looked into OpenLayers in a few years, you absolutely should — it's astonishing how much it progressed: from something that I was so frustrated with that it prompted me to write Leaflet in the first place (11 years ago) to a modern, fast, well-engineered and lovingly maintained library. It's especially great when you're doing complex GIS stuff and need a to…
Thanks for creating Leaflet and Mapbox GL! Do you have any specific examples of "complex GIS stuff" (Uses OpenLayers) or a "highly interactive app" (Uses MapBox GL)? Are there any big feature gaps from leaflet->mapbox-gl that developers should consider when choosing a mapping library?
When I was working with this stuff, Leaflet was more "view only" and not so much editing. This was back in the "have to support IE6" days. I remember trying Leaflet for a simple project, but gave up since I could not set a bounding box for panning (the map was only supposed to show a limited area of the world), while OpenLayers seemed had every API feature one could wish. Although more bloated, less polished :)
Re: OpenLayers
#89Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks for creating Leaflet and Mapbox GL! Do you have any specific examples of "complex GIS stuff" (Uses OpenLayers) or a "highly interactive app" (Uses MapBox GL)? Are there any big feature gaps from leaflet->mapbox-gl that developers should consider when choosing a mapping library?
To answer your question: Leaflet.draw is superior to mapbox-gl-draw. mapbox-gl-draw is very lightly maintained and is not as full featured as Leaflet.draw. mapbox-gl-draw sounds like it may also be no longer maintained by Mapbox in the future either - refer to the recent GitHub issue on the repos that hints at this. There are mapbox-gl-draw plugins to make it comparable to Leaflet.draw but these are features IMO that…