OpenBSD 6.6
81–90 of 92 posts
Re: OpenBSD 6.6
#82Re: OpenBSD 6.6
#83Re: OpenBSD 6.6
#84Re: OpenBSD 6.6
#85Earlier quoted context omitted.
for one of Theo's recent hints see: https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=156932725121978&w=2
Why ruin it for the majority because a few doesn't known what they are doing? I know the argument is that everyone has the disk space these days, but I still don't like to install the entire X window system, compilers etc. for a small embedded system. What's next, force install of Libreoffice and Firefox because a few desktop users can't use the package manager?
Re: OpenBSD 6.6
#86Re: OpenBSD 6.6
#87Just a reminder: you still have to read the preupgrade stuff before and do the manual file deletion stuff afterwards even if you do sysupgrade. Most will need to do the pkg_add -u after all that. Here is the link (I always have to look for it): * https://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade66.html
Re: OpenBSD 6.6
#88Earlier quoted context omitted.
I suppose you could just keep posting this until they follow through with their idea of having only one set to prevent people like you from complaining about this non issue. Or do you think being passive aggressive on hacker news is going to change their collective, long held stance on this issue?
No, what will happen is that sooner rather than later “people like you” will kill my casual interest in this stuff with personal attacks.
Re: OpenBSD 6.6
#89Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why ruin it for the majority because a few doesn't known what they are doing? I know the argument is that everyone has the disk space these days, but I still don't like to install the entire X window system, compilers etc. for a small embedded system. What's next, force install of Libreoffice and Firefox because a few desktop users can't use the package manager?
The thing I realized about OpenBSD is it’s made by and for the developers. They are going to do what works for them and fits their priorities. Not what works for the widest possible audience.
Re: OpenBSD 6.6
#90The OpenBSD developers are not too thrilled to hear about these sorts of issues, but looks like sysupgrade installed sets I didn't have before (x*66.tgz, game66.tgz).
In the 90s disks were smaller and it might have made more sense to exclude compilers or exclude X. I used to not put X on headless machines. But today disk space is big and cheap.
I hope they're real complaints and not i.e. we need install menu changed from "install xserver [x]" to "how u liek the xserver? now[ ] never[ ] now with extra firefox, please[x]"