Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm honestly not criticizing, I think I'm just missing something here. It seems like a good service in the interface offered, but where are the photos actually stored? Am I correctly interpreting this to mean that there's no cloud involved, everything runs off your own computer? Is anything accessible from another computer?
No problem! It's not a traditional SaaS website, nor traditional desktop app, so I need to some practice with describing it so it's clear to people. PhotoStructure runs on a computer you own, or in the cloud, on a computer you rent. That could be a laptop you have, or a home server, your NAS, or a digitalocean droplet. Your photos need to be available to that computer when they are imported into your library, either…
The more you use Facebook, the worse you feel (2017)
81–83 of 83 posts
Re: The more you use Facebook, the worse you feel (2017)
#82Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Facebook is a city. It's full of zany characters, and beautiful art I'd say it's the last place one would (or should) look for "beautiful art"...
All the artists I know use it. That's the only reason I started using it. But then, I hang out with artists, and I work in the arts. Like any city, it's full of every subculture you can imagine. The city I know is not the same as the city you know.
Re: The more you use Facebook, the worse you feel (2017)
#83Earlier quoted context omitted.
If your photos live on the service's servers, they are no longer yours. That's intrinsic to the nature of software as a service. I realize that makes me sound crazy, but after years of reflecting on software, privacy, data ownership, and decentralization, I have not been able to avoid the conclusion that Stallman was basically right. If your data lives in a cluster with a bunch of other people's, it's a tempting targ…
>If your photos live on the service's servers, they are no longer yours. They very easily could be, if the service wanted to write it's contract of adhesion to allow the user meaningful control over the scope of how the service can use the photos. But conventional wisdom believes there is less money in that route, and nobody in "tech" is willing to settle for less than maximum exploitation of assets.
Practically, it's not. See my concern about security beaches.
Even if the service has a sane ownership policy right now, eventually someone will either change the service's policies or shut the service down.