Earlier quoted context omitted.
Out of all the ways he could get his point across, you think he just landed within a hamming distance of 2 of a misleading one on accident? >But then I can't imagine a layperson having any idea what almost any of the sentence you quoted means anyways so your point seems pretty moot. You're not being honest here. If you can't imagine it, it is because you're not trying. People walk away with impressions, even if they…
> You're not being honest here. If you can't imagine it, it is because you're not trying. I was being honest. Please don't tell me I'm lying; assume good faith. I still claim that his wording 'Wolfram Language gets it right' versus 'Wolfram Language got it right' would leave a layperson with the impression different than what you claim. I could be wrong. I'd be willing to make a (nominal) bet about the outcome of a r…
pro.
Used to refer to an indefinitely specified person; one.
In any case, this issue is not important enough for me to be spending any more time on it, so if you don't understand me, we'll just have to live with that.