>And, more important… does it matter? If author wants to continue using CF for his own reasons, that's fine but it's still worth knowing why others care about popularity : 1) job prospects - e.g. knowing Javascript will have more relevance in job hunting than knowing Microsoft's VBScript that was used in Internet Explorer 8. 2) large community that has seen similar problems and can provide answers to copy&paste code…
OTOH, all reasons are cons... an expert in an esoteric system with none of those will be paid her weight in gold by the fewer employers in need of a very finite resource... while js programmers are a dime a dozen.
Coldfusion is “Unpopular” – I don’t care
81–83 of 83 posts
Re: Coldfusion is “Unpopular” – I don’t care
#82A year or two ago I would have replied that ColdFusion is actually dead, and that using it or really, even, maintaining applications in it is irresponsible, because it's virtually impossible to secure. But I think it may have become so archaic that vulnerability researchers aren't really hitting it as much any more? Maybe you've weathered the storm, and CF will be safe to use from here on out? (Obviously: don't use C…
When you say archaic are you saying that the language hasn't been kept up to date? (If so you would be wrong)
Re: Coldfusion is “Unpopular” – I don’t care
#83Earlier quoted context omitted.
I was talking about the nuclear version/free energy thing mentioned by the parent. The language itself is probably more popular than the "tech", at least it demonstrably works.
Cold fusion isn’t free energy - I don’t know where you got that idea.