Earlier quoted context omitted.
> (1) the lightning network has been repeatedly attacked as unworkable trash [ Disclosure: I work on the lightning specification and one of the implementations ] I'm sure it has been attacked (because "cryptos, bro"), I'm disappointed that it made you dismiss it. FWIW, I switched from Linux Kernel development to developing Lightning after almost 20 years: I find it ambitious, high-potential and fascinating, as well a…
I don't mean to attack you. It's just that there is a large gap between well-engineered and easy to use. I am 100% certain you're a better developer than I, and that lightning is not a result of poor engineering. But if a layman can't pick it up and use it in under 5 minutes, it's unworkable (if you're targeting laymen). Crypto is full of genius engineers, and product folks, but I think there is (and always has been)…
In this scenario linux is unworkable since a cli is probably too much for a layman. But that's why people built gnome and other window managers on top of the "unworkable" but useful core.
All we have to do is wait for some people to build that nice pretty layer on top - but the core must be an efficient tool