Live data from Hacker News

SpaceX nails triple booster landing after satellite delivery

bbc.com

81–90 of 128 posts

Re: SpaceX nails triple booster landing after satellite delivery

#81
post #78
post #16

Not only that, but apparently they recovered both fairings: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https:/... So 5 out of 5...

Same link but this one doesn't report your click to google: https://www.teslarati.com/spacex-falcon-heavy-fairing-recove...

I see multiple requests to ampproject on the official page, so Google is getting data regardless.

Re: SpaceX nails triple booster landing after satellite delivery

#82
post #38

This really looks good for launch costs long-term. The Heavy costs $90 million per reusable launch with a 64,000 kg payload, or $1400 per kilogram.[1] Current versions of the Falcon 9 and Heavy can fly ten times with virtually no refurbishment between flights.[2] The only part they throw away is the $7.5 million upper stage.[3] Their expendable cost is $150M and they haven't really started reusing yet, so if they act…

For the moment they also throw away the fairing, which I assume isn't included in your $7.5 million as it's been reported to cost $6 million by itself (at least for regular Falcon 9 -- not sure if the Heavy fairing is different). They've been working on fairing recovery, but have yet to succeed.

EDIT: scratch that, apparently the recovered the fairings as well per a comment below. Neat!

Re: SpaceX nails triple booster landing after satellite delivery

#83
post #67

I was at Kennedy Space Center's Apollo/Saturn V viewing site for this launch and it was amazing. If you ever have the opportunity to be there for a Falcon Heavy launch, do yourself a favor and go. It's quite an experience and totally worth the money.

What was amazing about it? Tell us the story.

Aside from the whole historical factors of the location itself (for instance: the humans sent to the moon were launched from that same launch pad), watching the launch from a video or live stream does not tell the entire story.

To hear the roar of those 27 engines and feel it vibrating on your chest and the bleachers is an emotional experience. Then you can see the boosters coming back, and their entry burn and you can follow them down to their landing zones. A few seconds later you hear the sonic booms.

While all this is happening, you also have the energy of the happy crowd cheering and celebrating what humans are capable of doing.

It gives you hope and an exciting future to look forward.

Re: SpaceX nails triple booster landing after satellite delivery

#84
post #5

I wonder what emergency procedure is in place in case the landing is off-course. Does it blow itself up?

As an addendum to that, if one accidentally lands in my back yard, can I keep it?

Most likely not, but considering my house would likely be on fire and the hearing damage, I feel a booster would be decent compensation.

Re: SpaceX nails triple booster landing after satellite delivery

#85

Can we finally stop having sci-fi films in which the whole outcome of the movie is solely determined on some heroic manual flying of a spaceship while simultaneously using manually aimed weapons like it's World War II?

My favorite sci-fi anticipates increased autonomy of technology and incorporates that smoothly into the narrative.

Re: SpaceX nails triple booster landing after satellite delivery

#86
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I guess salt water isn't that much of an issue after all?

Yea, I wish we'd get a more detailed explanation of the accounting on this. For all I knew it was totally plausible that fairings would be destroyed by sea water, and it was also plausible there'd be no damage. The part that confuses me is why they would spend so much effort trying to catch them with Mr. Steven if they are in fact serviceable after a swim. Maybe the idea is that salt-water refurbishment-and-reuse sav…

[deleted]

Re: SpaceX nails triple booster landing after satellite delivery

#87
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I guess salt water isn't that much of an issue after all?

Yea, I wish we'd get a more detailed explanation of the accounting on this. For all I knew it was totally plausible that fairings would be destroyed by sea water, and it was also plausible there'd be no damage. The part that confuses me is why they would spend so much effort trying to catch them with Mr. Steven if they are in fact serviceable after a swim. Maybe the idea is that salt-water refurbishment-and-reuse sav…

I think their customers would be more comfortable with (re)using a Caught fairing, so that was Plan A. Also not all fairings are the same. Most have acoustic blankets and other components that need to maintain strict ratings. Remember, many payloads are more expensive than the rocket and the fairing requirements are usually margined-up by the satellite manufacturer to avoid blame for failure.

Re: SpaceX nails triple booster landing after satellite delivery

#90
post #67

I was at Kennedy Space Center's Apollo/Saturn V viewing site for this launch and it was amazing. If you ever have the opportunity to be there for a Falcon Heavy launch, do yourself a favor and go. It's quite an experience and totally worth the money.

Yeah, if you have a week of free time. I planned to go this weekend but chickened out at the last second-turned out in my favor since they launched yesterday, four days after the original date.
Post reply on HN