Earlier quoted context omitted.
Oh, hello! My gut feeling was that csv-next is pointing to the informal specification (and they read like it, but specific to a single problem point). I guess you might not have understood my complaint (my bad), so let me give some examples how the specification should look like. An informal specification looks like this [1]. You should give examples and rules enough to use your format and sufficient to implement mos…
I think you don't understand :-). A specification doesn't always have to be complicated, that's the point. I'm all for tech notes with all the details. Here's a challenge for you - write a csv parser - I know - it's a daunting task. For inspiration, here's an example from your humble self - https://github.com/csv11/csvreader
Re: CSV 1.1 – CSV Evolved (for Humans)
#81You should stop using smilies in this passive-aggressive manner. You should also stop condescending to people. You may feel that you can't be wrong so they must not understand because they are too dumb and daunted by it, but you should not be revealing that to them in your comments, because it's so offputting.