Live data from Hacker News

Cognitive Distortions of People Who Get Stuff Done (2012) [pdf]

pdfs.semanticscholar.org

81–90 of 160 posts

Re: Cognitive Distortions of People Who Get Stuff Done (2012) [pdf]

#81

Hypothesis: the "people who get stuff done" are a subset of a larger group with the same personality and talents, but without as much luck. Those other people are known by unprintable names, because they have no great successes to make people ignore the fact that they're jerks.

This is sports and really any competitive zero-sum area in a nutshell. To be in it you have to have an inflated sense of your possibility of success, but to have said success you nonetheless have to be in it, so anyone who makes it is going to be a person with somewhat unrealistic reasoning, but since there's no feedback loop they never get the message that their reasoning was unrealistic.

Re: Cognitive Distortions of People Who Get Stuff Done (2012) [pdf]

#82
post #46
post #11

By what measure do the people studied ‘get stuff done’? By virtue of being a founder? Is this an attempt to shed light on productivity or a backhanded way to compliment the Silicon Valley crowd? Generally you get things done by being dedicated and having the ability to deliver, rather than having a distorted vision of reality.

All the people I know who are extremely productive (moms of 7, doctors, athletes) share exactly zero of that SV narcissist list. This is really low-quality content with a nonsensical title.

Unsurprisingly, narcissists ceaselessly try to define for everyone else what’s “good”/“valuable”/“productive” as that which corresponds to their own behavior. Ayn Rand practically built a religion around narcissism, for example.

Re: Cognitive Distortions of People Who Get Stuff Done (2012) [pdf]

#83
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I recently heard that the same brain regions are involved in processing temporal and spatial distances.

In my own anecdotal experience, this appears quite reasonable; oftentimes, especially in childhood, stretches of time as short as 1 week into the future would "feel" (i.e. encompass the same emotions/sensations) as knowing how far away my relatives in Canada were from me. The perception of time seriously befuddled my brain for years -- no matter that it still does to this day! If you happen to recall the outlets you…

> especially in childhood

Think of time spans as "percentage of life lived so far", and a lot of that particular time stretching suddenly makes sense.

Re: Cognitive Distortions of People Who Get Stuff Done (2012) [pdf]

#85
The Big Five

* Personal exceptionalism

* Dichotomous thinking

* Correct overgeneralization

* Blank canvas thinking

* Schumpeterianism (creative destruction)

i don't endorse the guy and didn't vote for him, but, um, this reminds me of Trump.

i mean, how can we assess any person who actually succeeded at a goal that thousands of others wanted but failed to achieve?

i don't know. how did this guy avoid losing? it's just so weird. i'm still seeking good theories for his unexpected success...

Re: Cognitive Distortions of People Who Get Stuff Done (2012) [pdf]

#87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're communicating that there are just two dichotomies: either one believes luck is real and so should just do nothing and buy lottery tickets, or one believes it's not real and is doing things that are useful. Otherwise, I'm not sure what you were aiming at with the lottery ticket example, given that it's pretty much nobody's choice even if they believe in luck.

I spent nearly 6 years homeless. There are an awful lot of people who are homeless whose plan seems to be "buy lottery tickets" and otherwise do little or nothing to improve their situation because it seems hopeless. They feel they need a "big win" and anything less won't matter. I worked hard at solving my problems and eventually got myself off the street. There are lots of people who seem to apply that same general…

cool... would you point us to some of your writing? i needed some scary/wake-up moments to nudge my health into the right zone!

Re: Cognitive Distortions of People Who Get Stuff Done (2012) [pdf]

#88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I spent nearly 6 years homeless. There are an awful lot of people who are homeless whose plan seems to be "buy lottery tickets" and otherwise do little or nothing to improve their situation because it seems hopeless. They feel they need a "big win" and anything less won't matter. I worked hard at solving my problems and eventually got myself off the street. There are lots of people who seem to apply that same general…

cool... would you point us to some of your writing? i needed some scary/wake-up moments to nudge my health into the right zone!

I don't like posting my health blog on HN. You can find it via my twitter account if you really want.

Pocketputer.com should get you to both Street Life Solutions (About page) and San Diego Homeless Survival Guide (Links page).

My Patreon link is in my profile as well.

Re: Cognitive Distortions of People Who Get Stuff Done (2012) [pdf]

#89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Possibly true but doesn't affect the outcome. If you can do some things to increase the likelihood of success with low cost, the fact that success is dominated by things you can't change doesn't matter. There are no guarantees, only actions that mildly bias one outcome over another.

Except, does it bias the outcome at all? If you do a meta study of a thousand different medications that work, you’d discover the single most common ingredients are starch or cellulose. Clearly it’s worth taking either or both to stay healthy! Of course this ignores the fact that they’re just filler, the active ingredients are the tiny fraction of the total recipe that are actually pharmacologically active. The prese…

Medications are indicated for disease. Only pseudoscientists take drugs for health.

Re: Cognitive Distortions of People Who Get Stuff Done (2012) [pdf]

#90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Except, does it bias the outcome at all? If you do a meta study of a thousand different medications that work, you’d discover the single most common ingredients are starch or cellulose. Clearly it’s worth taking either or both to stay healthy! Of course this ignores the fact that they’re just filler, the active ingredients are the tiny fraction of the total recipe that are actually pharmacologically active. The prese…

Medications are indicated for disease. Only pseudoscientists take drugs for health.

Statins? Hypertensive meditations? Anxiolytics? Prophylaxis in general?
Post reply on HN