Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can separately unfollow retweets from accounts that do that too much.
You sure can, but you can't turn off seeing what people you follow liked (unless you use something like Tweetdeck or an app that doesn't support this 'feature'). I find that worse than retweets because a lot of people apparently use the 'like' button as a sort of read receipt and 'like' everything that shows up in their feed.
Battling Fake Accounts, Twitter to Slash Millions of Followers
81–90 of 116 posts
Re: Battling Fake Accounts, Twitter to Slash Millions of Followers
#82Earlier quoted context omitted.
Exactly this. My other beef with twitter is a more sophisticated way to filter my timeline. I mean something that would make sense to a programmer, not the typical user friendly useless thing.
Yes I haven’t become a bigger Twitter user because it’s a huge time suck to actually get to the few topics/groups I care about. Medium also needs to do similar.
Re: Battling Fake Accounts, Twitter to Slash Millions of Followers
#83There's really only one solution to Twitter's problem, and anything short of it is just nonsense placating. They have to open up profile verification to all applicants. It would fix the platform overnight. You could just immediately ignore anyone who's not verified, yet it would still be optional for those who don't care.
There’s another solution: the platform is free if you have less than n followers or follow less than n users. Say n is 15 for example. Above that you pay for every tweet. On a sliding scale, say the first tweet/day is 5c, the 10th is $1. They could even ditch scammy advertising - brands who wanted to “engage” would simply pay directly to tweet.
Re: Battling Fake Accounts, Twitter to Slash Millions of Followers
#84Odd that they counted in the first place. Maybe this is part of a phased roll out to identify first (refine the models), then take punitive action? The cynic in me says they counted in the first place because it helped everyone's ego (and wallet) "Most of the time, according to Twitter, the locked accounts are not included in the monthly active user count it reports to investors each quarter, a critical Wall Street m…
> The cynic in me says they counted in the first place because it helped everyone's ego (and wallet) I don't think you're being cynical. They counted in the first place because it helped their _metrics_ – Twitter is in the business of selling advertising and made the decisions they did in service of their advertising metrics.
Re: Battling Fake Accounts, Twitter to Slash Millions of Followers
#85There's really only one solution to Twitter's problem, and anything short of it is just nonsense placating. They have to open up profile verification to all applicants. It would fix the platform overnight. You could just immediately ignore anyone who's not verified, yet it would still be optional for those who don't care.
There's really only one solution to Twitter's problem, and anything short of it is just nonsense placating. They have to open up profile verificatio There’s another solution: the platform is free if you have less than n followers or follow less than n users. Say n is 15 for example. Above that you pay for every tweet. On a sliding scale, say the first tweet/day is 5c, the 10th is $1. They could even ditch scammy adve…
Re: Battling Fake Accounts, Twitter to Slash Millions of Followers
#86Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Kudos to twitter Kudos? I wouldn't hand over a kudos to twitter. The article triggering this bot ban wave [1] was written by the Times and included behavior analysis that Twitter easily could (and may have) done on its own years ago. Facebook's actions and marketer value has nothing to do with Twitter's own lack of action to prevent infiltration and manipulation of its platform. Twitter's action on stopping spam, b…
He keeps on saying they don't do enough, the times is able to do this despite not even having access to raw internal data I feel like Twitter as an organization doesn't actually care about the problem, just about their image. Why else would they talk about the hate speech stuff and continuously elevate groups like The Proud Boys through their verification process (that also affects their suggestion algorithms). And w…
If otherwise, they'd have suspended Trump's account for ToS violations long ago.
Re: Battling Fake Accounts, Twitter to Slash Millions of Followers
#87Kudos to twitter on this. This is one of those moves that harms them in the eyes of short term investors, but is The Right Thing To Do. I've always been astounded that nobody seems to notice that Facebook continually announces record users, record MAUs and then usually a week or two after their quarterly numbers announces that they have removing millions of fake accounts. Always after they've 'beaten' on those metric…
As a twitter user, it doesn't matter to me. I don't see these bots & fake users. What annoys me with all these platform is that that they choose what to show me. I wish to see all posts/tweets in the exact order it was created. That's it, don't decide who's I should see. Every once in a while, I'm shocked to come across someone I was following and havent' seen their tweet only to check their profile and see they have…
I hardly use it but i checked my account last evening skimmed through my feed and saw nothing productive. What caught my attention though was a Forbes tweet projecting one of the Kardashians becoming a billionaire because of some cosmetic empire?
I dont even follow anything fashionable except Thomas H. Ptacek and Paul Graham.
I instantly deactivated my account pending deletion. Twitter is as much of a cesspit as Facebook.
Re: Battling Fake Accounts, Twitter to Slash Millions of Followers
#88Oh my absolute fuck. Every single Elon Musk tweet is followed up by an account with an identical image, and a one-character-off twitter account pretending to continue the conversation with a 'surprise'. It's always a link to some crypto BS. How in the hell Twitter can't auto-block that, particularly when the source account is a verified one, is behind my comprehension.
I also find it so strange that Twitter hasn't done anything to specifically limit these accounts. They could even naively block normal users from having a verified user's profile picture and this problem would virtually not exist.
Re: Battling Fake Accounts, Twitter to Slash Millions of Followers
#89Re: Battling Fake Accounts, Twitter to Slash Millions of Followers
#90But, to do so they would have to place some power in the hands of the users. They don't want to do this because it means a loss of their control over what you see.
We already know that FB experimented with pushing people's mood and views on subjects around; Twitter is not immune to such temptation also.
Simply: assign 2 scores to every user, each out of say, 1000 (100 is not enough given Twitter's large userbase).
1 score is a category score, such as "lgbt politics" or even finer-grained than that, easily done by simply reading all of a user's tweets and using Bayesian (or some other classifier) auto-classification. This is a measure of how the user is perceived by others, inside that category.
The other score is a combination of per-region or per-country (because in general, people care about the people in their own country or region more), plus number of times a user gets a like or retweet in that same region, etc.
Then, simply let people filter based on those 2 scores. If I set score 1 at (cutoff everyone below 900) I will get top tweeters in each subject; if I set score 2 at (cutoff 200) I will let most tweets across the world reach me. etc. etc.