Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sure, it seems to agree with those studies. But let's suppose that the religion vs word length chart is a valid measure of intelligence. Are you then prepared to defend the same conclusion about the race vs word length chart? Or will you start looking for confounding factors, eg, Latinos trend Catholic? If so, think about why you accepted the religion claim on its face, but examined the race claim more carefully.
Because religion is a choice based on personal beliefs and/or reason (but usually the former). Race is a state of being. I'm not quite sure what you're trying to get at.
The Real ‘Stuff White People Like’
81–84 of 84 posts
Re: The Real ‘Stuff White People Like’
#82Earlier quoted context omitted.
The metric about adherence was made up and without explanation of how they categorized people. The Coleman-Liau Index is based on lengths of words, which proves... what, exactly? Many of the "most" religious people scored higher than the ones rated "meh". Also, agnostics are in the middle of the pack. So what does this chart predict? That certain self-selected religious categories in their dataset correlate with word…
You can take the data without the commentary, though. The results actually fit nicely with a "pseudointellectual, tries to sound smart" stereotype I have about internet atheists. (I'm an atheist myself, but can't stand reddit.com/r/atheism types.)
Re: The Real ‘Stuff White People Like’
#83Re: The Real ‘Stuff White People Like’
#84Earlier quoted context omitted.
Interesting, I was thinking the exact opposite, since those bars are all super annoying.
Oh wow, that is annoying. I do like the pop-out bars that the NYT has at the end of their articles, though. See, for example, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/07/business/economy/07jobs.ht...