Live data from Hacker News

NoScript Not Available for Latest Firefox

noscript.net

81–84 of 84 posts

Re: NoScript Not Available for Latest Firefox

#81
post #62
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Killing the old extension API is a painful, but important, step. From a security standpoint, WebExtensions are a lot better, since they are sandboxed and require explicit permissions to be granted for many things. From a developer standpoint, they are easier to deal with, being JavaScript, and since Chrome and Edge support similar APIs, developers will no longer need multiple codebases to support their extensions on…

> From a security standpoint, WebExtensions are a lot better, since they are sandboxed In a sandbox even I, as the owner of the computer, can't let them out of. That's not cool. > From a developer standpoint, they are easier to deal with, being JavaScript, and since Chrome and Edge support similar APIs, developers will no longer need multiple codebases to support their extensions on multiple browsers. In the sense th…

> In a sandbox even I, as the owner of the computer, can't let them out of. That's not cool.

If you want unsandboxed extensions, you can install Nightly or Dev Edition and flip the extensions.legacy.preference. The basic problem with providing a simpler escape hatch on release Firefox is that if you compare the number of users who are equipped to make an informed choice about allowing extension X arbitrary access to browser internals versus the number of users who will be tricked into letting malware do terrible things, the second number is multiple orders of magnitude larger than the first. I understand why folks are unsatisfied with the "use Nightly or Dev Edition with the preference flipped" solution but I am certain that it is the least bad option.

Re: NoScript Not Available for Latest Firefox

#83
post #74
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think you can switch to an unbranded build of 57, and enable legacy addons. https://wiki.mozilla.org/Add-ons/Extension_Signing#Latest_Bu... You could also install the Developer Edition or a Nightly build. They're slightly less stable (usually pretty good for me) but they have the same option. https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/channel/desktop/

> enable legacy addons Does that mean the XPCOM system has just been flagged as disabled, but not been removed yet?

Various stuff has been removed. Other things have not been removed yet. You can see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=13475... for a non-exhaustive list of things that can definitely be removed but haven't been yet.

Re: NoScript Not Available for Latest Firefox

#84
post #32

I've always used YesScript, it has a much simpler UI -> basically a single button which remembers if JS is on/off for a given site. It's always been puzzling to me why YesScript is less popular... And yes, it's available for the latest FF as YesScript2 [1] [1] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/yesscript2/

"YesScript" is significantly less secure and powerful. Most importantly, with NoScript I can block tracking and ad-related javascript while still running the page's first-party javascript. With yesscript, I don't get that granularity. Perhaps that's why it's less popular. I also believe that it came out later and thus hasn't had the time to gather such a following as noscript has (though who would use a worse version…

Hi, I'm the developer of YesScript2 and I've just released a new version with 3 state blocking that makes it even better alternative I believe because you have 3 options: 1) no blocking (grey icon) 2) half blocking (allowing internal scripts and blocking external, blue icon, so you can allow now first-party Javascript as you mentioned) and full blocking (blocking internal and external scripts too, red icon).
Post reply on HN