Live data from Hacker News

“Spiel des Jahres” Game of the Year 2017 winners

spieldesjahres.com

81–90 of 97 posts

Re: “Spiel des Jahres” Game of the Year 2017 winners

#81

I'm a digital nomad. I'd like something a bit more exciting than simple card or dice games, but space is at a bit of a premium. Any recommendations for games that have a lot of depth (and thus can be played over and over), are very quick to pick up the basics (so we can teach others), and are physically tiny (or can be)?

Carcassonne is what i use for that niche.

it is a complex game with a very simple ruleset (i.e. one-operation per turn, every turn is the same)

There is an ipad version which is better than the physical one (easier to learn since it only allows legal moves, automatically keeps score, automatically shuffles) Plus no clean-up.

If you don't have internet and are alone, you can play against an AI and still have a good time. If you have internet you can play 1v1 with ranked matchmaking opponents and continue to get better.

If you want to play in a group, you can play a local game passing around the ipad. I've played this way with a group of people who had never played the game before, everyone finished knowing not only the gameplay rules but with inferred nuances about strategy.

Re: “Spiel des Jahres” Game of the Year 2017 winners

#82
post #66
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hive. 2 player though.

Seconded. There's a pocket edition that comes in a nifty bag

The non-pocket edition I bought came with a nifty bag too. Only difference is the tiles are bigger.

Re: “Spiel des Jahres” Game of the Year 2017 winners

#83
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Board games are so so so good these days, just avoid Monopoly. ;) According to https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Monopoly_(game)&o... Monopoly was intended as a way to demonstrate that an economy which rewards wealth creation is better than one in which monopolists work under few constraints. In other words and put much more harshly: Monopoly is played the right way if after a short time one player is happ…

This really should have been written on the box explicitly. I didn't see the connection until someone pointed it out to me when I was already an adult. All I have from this game is memories of boredom playing it with family as a kid.

[deleted]

Re: “Spiel des Jahres” Game of the Year 2017 winners

#84
post #53
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For physical games: Citadels, Hanabi, Love Letter (pick about any flavor), Star Realms, Sushi Go! or Sushi Go Party!, Jaipur, Werewords, One Night Ultimate Werewolf/Alien/Vampire Digital games (mobile or computer): Ticket to Ride, Star Realms, Jaipur, Splendor (I'd recommend the physical game but it is a bit too much air in the box to buy physically for a nomad), Patchwork.

One Night Ultimate Werewolf gives the app away for free, and you can play with just a deck of cards.

Quite true. Some groups will have problems without a few of the aids, though, so it is definitely not a requirement but a nice to have.

Re: “Spiel des Jahres” Game of the Year 2017 winners

#85

Anyone have suggestions for two-player games?

- Jaipur (set collection)

- Love Letter (any flavor; draw a card and play one)

- Condottiere (bidding/bluffing game to take over italy)

- Citadels (drafting)

- Masquerade (hidden-ish roles; better at two than Coup is)

- Portal of Heroes (scales well up to 5)

- Star Realms (deck-building)

- Splendor (similar to Jaipur but chips rather than cards)

- Codenames: Duet

Re: “Spiel des Jahres” Game of the Year 2017 winners

#86

I'm a digital nomad. I'd like something a bit more exciting than simple card or dice games, but space is at a bit of a premium. Any recommendations for games that have a lot of depth (and thus can be played over and over), are very quick to pick up the basics (so we can teach others), and are physically tiny (or can be)?

- San Juan (2-4 players) - Haggis (2-3) - Dominion (2-4 players, box is nice but you can just have a stack of cards) All the other suggestions are good, but it's nice to have flexibility with player size.

As an alternative to the Dominion base game, you can also use the Dominion: Intrigue expansion as a standalone (or as a base for the other expansions). It provides a substantially different 'flavor', although the rules are the same.

Re: “Spiel des Jahres” Game of the Year 2017 winners

#87
post #85

Anyone have suggestions for two-player games?

- Jaipur (set collection) - Love Letter (any flavor; draw a card and play one) - Condottiere (bidding/bluffing game to take over italy) - Citadels (drafting) - Masquerade (hidden-ish roles; better at two than Coup is) - Portal of Heroes (scales well up to 5) - Star Realms (deck-building) - Splendor (similar to Jaipur but chips rather than cards) - Codenames: Duet

Lovely, thanks :)

Re: “Spiel des Jahres” Game of the Year 2017 winners

#89
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Zendo is terrific: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zendo_(game) One player thinks of a secret rule, and the others have to guess the rule by building little sculptures. It's best played with a set of Icehouse pieces, which pack pretty small and can be used for a whole bunch of other games too. You don't need Icehouse pieces, though, you can also play Zendo with coins, matchsticks, etc.

I think Zendo is better with a set of basic lego blocks (1x1, 2x1, 2x2) in 3 colours. It's easier to construct and build things. But fundamentally it is an incredible game in whatever form you play.

Wow, Lego blocks! That's a great idea, I'll have to try it.

Re: “Spiel des Jahres” Game of the Year 2017 winners

#90
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Zendo is terrific: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zendo_(game) One player thinks of a secret rule, and the others have to guess the rule by building little sculptures. It's best played with a set of Icehouse pieces, which pack pretty small and can be used for a whole bunch of other games too. You don't need Icehouse pieces, though, you can also play Zendo with coins, matchsticks, etc.

I think Zendo is better with a set of basic lego blocks (1x1, 2x1, 2x2) in 3 colours. It's easier to construct and build things. But fundamentally it is an incredible game in whatever form you play.

Do you require your Lego structures to be fully connected? Seems like that limits the possibilities a bit, but it would mean you can safely pick them up and move them around, which is always fiddly in normal Zendo.
Post reply on HN