Live data from Hacker News

The Decline of Imgur on Reddit and the Rise of Reddit's Native Image Hosting

minimaxir.com

81–90 of 282 posts

Re: The Decline of Imgur on Reddit and the Rise of Reddit's Native Image Hosting

#81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why not use Dropbox public links or something similar?

Afaik, they discontinued offering public links as a way of hosting.

My friend links me to pictures he's put on Dropbox all the time, usually screenshots. Is that what you're referring to?

Re: The Decline of Imgur on Reddit and the Rise of Reddit's Native Image Hosting

#82
post #27

Imgur recently started doing something really annoying on their mobile site. If you keep scrolling past the picture you were linked to, it shows a bunch of other pictures that were not posted by the person who posted the first picture. These extra pictures seem to be generally in the same category as the picture that was meant to be linked to, so if the original picture is a slightly risque photo, the photos that fol…

The most offensive feature is how it tricks novice or unsuspecting users into "sharing" their just uploaded image to the "Imgur community". It's a big green button after the upload.

If you click it, not only is your image now public but you'll be ridiculed by imgurs army of sexist unemployed neckbeards that they refer to as "community".

Re: The Decline of Imgur on Reddit and the Rise of Reddit's Native Image Hosting

#83
post #27

Imgur recently started doing something really annoying on their mobile site. If you keep scrolling past the picture you were linked to, it shows a bunch of other pictures that were not posted by the person who posted the first picture. These extra pictures seem to be generally in the same category as the picture that was meant to be linked to, so if the original picture is a slightly risque photo, the photos that fol…

Is there an equivalent to "every program expands to read email" for web services? Because just about every image hosting service seems to go down this feature creep route.

Probably "every web service expands to become a social network."

Re: The Decline of Imgur on Reddit and the Rise of Reddit's Native Image Hosting

#84
post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is there an equivalent to "every program expands to read email" for web services? Because just about every image hosting service seems to go down this feature creep route.

Probably "every web service expands to become a social network."

I like it (heh).

Re: The Decline of Imgur on Reddit and the Rise of Reddit's Native Image Hosting

#85
post #27

Imgur recently started doing something really annoying on their mobile site. If you keep scrolling past the picture you were linked to, it shows a bunch of other pictures that were not posted by the person who posted the first picture. These extra pictures seem to be generally in the same category as the picture that was meant to be linked to, so if the original picture is a slightly risque photo, the photos that fol…

Their apps also suck. Uploading on mobile has extra steps pushing their app, but then their app sends push notices for shit I don't care about.

Re: The Decline of Imgur on Reddit and the Rise of Reddit's Native Image Hosting

#86
post #27

Imgur recently started doing something really annoying on their mobile site. If you keep scrolling past the picture you were linked to, it shows a bunch of other pictures that were not posted by the person who posted the first picture. These extra pictures seem to be generally in the same category as the picture that was meant to be linked to, so if the original picture is a slightly risque photo, the photos that fol…

What is really annoying is that it makes you think you're watching an album but as the image is not related it's confusing.

Re: The Decline of Imgur on Reddit and the Rise of Reddit's Native Image Hosting

#87
post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Afaik, they discontinued offering public links as a way of hosting.

My friend links me to pictures he's put on Dropbox all the time, usually screenshots. Is that what you're referring to?

No. Dropbox used to have a folder that let you share direct links.

https://www.dropbox.com/help/files-folders/public-folder

It's been retroactively removed from accounts.

Re: The Decline of Imgur on Reddit and the Rise of Reddit's Native Image Hosting

#88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

ironically, image hosting sites being crap was the reason imgur was created in the first place. turns out you have to pay the bills somehow

And most of them were crap because of mess, noisy sites with intrusive ads. The basic problem seems to be that the web has a trust issue, not between users and services. But between services and advertisers. Until that trust issue is solved, so that sites can bring ad hosting under their own domain rather than embed unsupervised ads from third parties, there will be no end to this runaround. That said, inhouse ad man…

Do you think it's possible to create an ethical ad network? It's something I wonder about at least once a month, but I'm not sure if it could compete.

Re: The Decline of Imgur on Reddit and the Rise of Reddit's Native Image Hosting

#89
post #20
post #11

Imgur pushing it's own website over direct image links is the exact reason I've stopped using it. I understand they have to make money by but I just want to put a damn picture on the internet and send the link to others. I don't want to have to deal with Imgur's album/site link crap and dumb expansion into being a social network. It's hard now to even find the direct link, nevermind avoid Imgur's annoying messages ab…

As it turns out, it's really hard to monetize an S3 bucket at scale.

What if they moved to their own infrastructure?

I imagine being an image hosting service it would be cheaper in the long run, although I have no idea by how much and if it would make sense all things considered.

Re: The Decline of Imgur on Reddit and the Rise of Reddit's Native Image Hosting

#90

Why on earth would Reddit want to add a massive expense (image hosting) at a time that they're already hemorrhaging money? Especially since imgur was still a fairly adequate host for the site. Reddit's image hosting seems like burning money for nothing. Not to mention the Reddit image URLs are horrifying. I upload stuff to imgur just for the nice, short URLs.

My significant other couldn't figure out how to easily post images on Reddit (without switching between two websites).

Now she's posting more content on Reddit, because it's easier and self contained.

There's also many advantages to keeping users "on site".

When will they start hosting short videos?

Post reply on HN