Lessons I Learned from the Dotcom Bubble for the Coming Cryptocurrency Bubble

Please do yourself a favor and invest in other things too. I'm also a bitcoin believer, but it's a relatively small part of my holdings, which are mostly in real estate.

So I am no expert in this field but I think the traceability by the random guy is not necessarily a problem because:

- until an amount in your possession has been spent, you can avoid that anyone knows who the corresponding BTC belong to (= you) by just using a new address when receiving the coins. Public knowledge about "having possessed coins" is only after a transaction and only if the random guy new that at least one of the last sources belonged to you.

- when you send BTC somewhere, nobody knows if these still belong to you if all outgoing amounts are sent to new addresses.

- There are "mixing services" that intend to "mix" amounts of several addresses, so traceability can be mitigated but IMO people have mixed feelings about them.

- There might be legal issues in case traceability becomes much better. E.g., coins might be blacklisted because they were gained illegally. Since you can trace those coins, it could be legally possible (though technically challenging) to "forbid" these coins and accuse of money laundering whoever accepted them anyway.

- There are other coins that are more concerned with this, I think monero (See sibling comment) is the most popular. You can always check what the dark market accepts to see what's good for you :)

- Finally, one mitigation is to keep only small amounts in many addresses, so all your counterparties only know a subbranch of your "transaction DAG" ("directed acyclic graph").

My own take is that all this means that nobody can ever track with certainty how much you have, only your "turnover". This holds as long as your counterparties (e.g., exchanges or employer) are not compromised and sufficiently well intended.

I don't think my employer is hiring Solidity devs at the moment but there's definitely lot of demand in general.

I would expect to see a surge and then a rapid drop off, but I think we've been in the surge for a while now. The surge reflects people not having faith in native Chinese markets, which has already been the case for most well-off, well-informed Chinese. They know their stock markets are a joke and that the government has been driving investment toward pointless building projects. The real estate market has been irrationally exuberant, in no small part because of the absence of alternative long-term savings vehicles such as interest bearing accounts or a reliable stock market. They also don't have complete faith in their government's respect for property rights and know having the option to flee abroad if things go south is invaluable.

And the PRB has been slowly ratcheting down the markup they pay on US dollars as an export subsidy, so the incentive to convert US dollars to renminbi relative to offshoring earnings via bitcoin or other channels has been declining over the past few years. Just to clarify what I mean because a lot of people don't realize this, but many Chinese exporters receive payment for goods in US dollars (or other foreign currency). The People's Republic Bank of China (their central bank) purchases those dollars with renminbi at a markup over the fair market value, basically giving the Chinese exporters a subsidy. That's part of why the PRB has such enormous US Treasury holdings. They bought so many US dollars that they couldn't invest them in anything other than US Treasuries. A billion dollars in cash is an asset. A trillion is an unmanageable inflation risk.

The PRB has been trying to move away from that model because they know it isn't long-term sustainable. So as that implicit subsidy declines, Chinese manufacturers receiving US dollars find alternative methods for converting their excess currency, such as BTC or other foreign currencies (e.g. the Canadian dollar), relatively more attractive.

The bottom line is that anyone who can afford to expatriate their capital has been doing so at the maximum viable rate for a long time now. A slowdown would simply reduce the amount that is available to expatriate, decreasing the US dollar -> BTC purchases and accelerating the BTC -> hard foreign assets such as real estate, reducing the total market cap for BTC. It's also possible the PRB might react to a slowdown by once again increasing the implicit export subsidy, which would divert funds from BTC transactions back into renminbi and further accelerate a crypto crash.

>Money is expatriated via Bitcoin from the PRC to, say, Vancouver. The point is that with a currency, people would be comfortable leaving it as Canadian dollars or US dollars.

No one is OK leaving their money in hard currency. That's why we invest it, or put it in interest bearing accounts. Leaving it under your mattress leads to losses to inflation. In that sense, currency is very much like a gallon of milk or a concert ticket, though it loses its value much more slowly in a healthy economy.

With BTC, we actually have the opposite problem, deflation. It is increasing in value every day, whereas with a normal fiat currency it is more efficient to have a low, stable rate of inflation (where the individual unit of currency loses its value over time).

So I don't disagree with you completely. You're right that BTC should be more like a concert ticket than it is. The important question is why it isn't.