Hah. Borland 3.1.Don't remember TP 3.5?
Let's compile like it's 1992 (2014)
81–84 of 84 posts
Re: Let's compile like it's 1992 (2014)
#82Hah. Borland 3.1.Don't remember TP 3.5?
I remember 3.0, 5.5, 6.0, 7.0 for MS-DOS and 1.5 for Windows, those are the ones I used, before switching full time to C++ as my next love in programming languages. :)
Re: Let's compile like it's 1992 (2014)
#83Grab a copy of Borland's IDE [0] while you're at it. Experience what was normal and good all those years ago, and marvel at how little distance we've come. [0] https://winworldpc.com/product/borland-c-builder/6x
Borland's IDE has a huge nostalgia factor for me, it was the first IDE that made it so I didn't have to think about linking and the rest of the toolchain, I could just hit 'Build'.
But while most of our tooling for Software Engineering is pretty archaic. I think there is a tooling revolution going on now, especially with new languages: autoformatters, graduation typing, memory ownership checkers, etc. I feel like as an industry we are slowly starting to take tooling seriously.
Re: Let's compile like it's 1992 (2014)
#84> mkdir a
I'm still smiling.