LiChess: Learn from your mistakes
81–90 of 115 posts
Re: LiChess: Learn from your mistakes
#82Re: LiChess: Learn from your mistakes
#83Can someone recommend excellent books and/or tutorials to learn chess? I know only basic rules, but no tactics/strategy/opening/etc.
For books, Beginners Mind by Jeremy Silman is pretty good, as is his endgame book. Logical Chess by Cherenev is also a great introduction to how skilled people think about games but takes a different approach than Silman.
[0] - http://chesstempo.com/
Re: LiChess: Learn from your mistakes
#84Can someone recommend excellent books and/or tutorials to learn chess? I know only basic rules, but no tactics/strategy/opening/etc.
Re: LiChess: Learn from your mistakes
#85Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sub optimal from the perspective of the AI, some positions that seem easy for an AI looking 10 moves ahead might be tricky for your opponent.
Sorry, but this makes my head hurt. >>> best chess engines are still worse at analyzing openings than humans. >> Is that actually the case, or perhaps humans try a lot of sub-optimal opening lines? > Sub optimal from the perspective of the AI There's no perspective involved: optimal play is perfect play, assuming the opponent also plays perfectly. If a move is sub-optimal for White that means White has a better move,…
Restricting yourself to perfect opponents is very silly firstly, because there are no perfect opponents because chess is unsolved. So right out of the gate our definition assumes the counterfactual for all chess games every played and is both inaccurate (does not describe actual chess) and impractical (cannot be implemented)
Secondly, if there were such an opponent (which is not at all clear there ever will be), there is no way within the rules of chess to detect whether or not we face it in a given game. Imperfect opponents are allowed to play chess, and assuming they are all perfect while a defensible strategy is merely one of several.
Thirdly, it leads to very counterintuitive results. Consider the case in which chess is solved and well-balanced (e.g. a perfect opponent P can force a draw). We modify P to create opponent NP. NP behaves as follows: if NP's opponent is consistent with P, NP will implement P (e.g. force a draw), if NP's opponent deviates from P, NP will lose (forefeit or make bad moves). Therefore everyone can beat NP except "optimal" algorithm P, which can only force a draw. So now we have an "optimal" algorithm with a 0 tournament rating.
In reality the whole "perfect opponent" thing is mostly a notational convenience for Zermelo's Theorem. Which is very interesting and useful if you are writing a proof, less interesting if you are trying to win a chess tournament. A more practical definition of "optimal" is something like "wins a lot of games".
Re: LiChess: Learn from your mistakes
#86Can someone recommend excellent books and/or tutorials to learn chess? I know only basic rules, but no tactics/strategy/opening/etc.
Re: LiChess: Learn from your mistakes
#87Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thibault simply wants to deliver the best online chess experience. Period. It's purely donation driven and he pulls a small salary from whatever's leftover after buying enough servers to keep the site up.
detailed cost breakdown https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1CGgu-7aNxlZkjLl9l-Ol... ( link came from here https://en.lichess.org/patron )
Re: LiChess: Learn from your mistakes
#88LiChess is one of the most amazing hosted platforms out there, it's very fast, it has a minimalistic design, it has no ads and does the thing that it does very well. Furthermore they sympathetically state: "Lichess mobile is developed and translated to 80 languages by volunteers. Just like the website, it's 100% free forever, and there will never be advertisements. This is humanist software, made open source for the…
That makes no sense. You can have games as short as you want. Just play using a different time control. I play 1+2 (minute plus seconds) and those games last 2 to 3 minutes at most.
BTW with variants, you're not really playing chess anymore. You're playing a different game with chess pieces. Not all the strategy and tactics transfer well if at all.