Live data from Hacker News

Nvidia adds telemetry to latest drivers

majorgeeks.com

81–90 of 242 posts

Re: Nvidia adds telemetry to latest drivers

#81
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

AMD are already doing sneaky things with their driver autoupdate on Windows, they put the checkbox below the "upgrade" button, prechecked and with a large spacing so it is likely you don't see it immediately and click "upgrade" before you realize it, and they also present the checkbox at least twice, rechecking it if you unchecked it previously. So I fear that after that move by Nvidia they'll feel empowered to push…

What was the checkbox for?

Enable auto update.

Re: Nvidia adds telemetry to latest drivers

#82
post #2

Good. Telemetry should have been in these video drivers for crash reporting for a decade. Would have helped a ton with various video game crashs and the low quality of video drivers.

On crash reporting, I just submitted https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12883823 about a privacy-related feature invented in 2011.

Re: Nvidia adds telemetry to latest drivers

#83
post #68

The article tries to get you to download "autoruns.zip" from their site. That's suspicious. But it seems to be OK. The official Microsoft version is at [1] and the ZIP files compare equal. [1] https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb963902.as...

If you know the sysinternals tool you want, you can grab it directly from live.sysinternals.com, which is an official microsoft site. e.g. http://live.sysinternals.com/autoruns.exe

Re: Nvidia adds telemetry to latest drivers

#84

I'm surprised by the backlash against telemetry on HN. How else are you supposed to improve reliability of software used on tens of millions of devices with an ear infinite number of hardware and software permutations?

By at least allowing the user to opt out.

> By at least allowing the user to opt out.

Rather: by requiring the user to opt in.

Re: Nvidia adds telemetry to latest drivers

#85
post #6

On a related note; I can't even use NVidia's "Geforce Experience" any more without logging in. Thanks for that, NVidia. Just what I wanted; a driver tool that forces me to log in.

I noticed the same thing. It's ridiculous. Geforce Experience doesn't do anything I care about except auto-update drivers. Why do I need to log in for that?

you forgot game capture/streaming and automatic game setting optimization

Re: Nvidia adds telemetry to latest drivers

#86
post #6

On a related note; I can't even use NVidia's "Geforce Experience" any more without logging in. Thanks for that, NVidia. Just what I wanted; a driver tool that forces me to log in.

Holy moly, I thought that this post was a joke for sure - and then I checked out GeForce Experience. Uninstalled. Never to be reinstalled. AMD will be my next card. Thanks nVidia for letting me know what you think of me :)

I'll be buying AMD as well, the RX 400 series already piqued my interest but I can't justify buying another budget GPU from nVidia, even though the 1050 looks pretty attractive.

Re: Nvidia adds telemetry to latest drivers

#87
post #75

I'm surprised by the backlash against telemetry on HN. How else are you supposed to improve reliability of software used on tens of millions of devices with an ear infinite number of hardware and software permutations?

When such telemetry exposes the names of programs you are running and is sent unencrypted, it's a big deal. Coupled with very specific hardware information, this could easily be used to track TOR users for example.

Doubt it's tracking all applications. Probably only GPU heavy ones like games, CAD and creative tools like Photoshop and Premiere.

Re: Nvidia adds telemetry to latest drivers

#89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I usually just download and install the latest driver with regular intervals. I don't choose to install/use GeForce Experience, and now that it requires login I certainly won't. Why would I want to use this Exprience thing anyway? It's crapware, right? As for telemetry - as long as software only sends reasonable things (feature usage etc) and uses reasonable bandwidth, I'm completely fine. I honestly don't even mind…

The problem is you'll never fully know what info they collect and send, and who might have access to it. It is equivalent to installing spyware.

If a program isn't evil, then it does only things that shouldn't require permission. Example: include the OS version and RAM amount in the http request to the upgrade server that is done on every startup.

Any info ever collected by no-permissions-asked telemetry must be such that it doesn't matter who has the information or what they do with it. If it isn't information of that kind then of course a program should ask permission. But that in my view isn't "telemetry" then. If it collects anything even remotely user-identifying or personal then it's in my definition not telemetry and should never be done without permission (if at all).

If a program really is malicious, then it doesn't matter if it asks for permission because why would that wouldn't respect the users wish anyway?

My argument wasn't pro/against telemetry, it was that asking permission doesn't change anything. Permission isn't what tells malicious programs from others. A benign program doesn't do things that needs permission to begin with.

Re: Nvidia adds telemetry to latest drivers

#90
What's "GeForce Experience", "Wireless Controller" and "ShadowPlay services"?

Do recent drivers always include the latter? How do I check for them? Are they kernel modules?

In my case, all the nvidia drivers I see loaded are:

    $ lsmod | grep nv
    nvidia_drm             20480  1
    drm                   294912  3 nvidia_drm
    nvidia_uvm            704512  0
    nvidia_modeset        770048  3 nvidia_drm
    nvidia              11866112  42 nvidia_modeset,nvidia_uvm
Post reply on HN