YouTube Go: YouTube reimagined for the next generation of YouTube viewers
81–90 of 217 posts
Re: YouTube Go: YouTube reimagined for the next generation of YouTube viewers
#82As much as this sounds like something I would personally be very interested in, I can't help but think it doesn't fit into Google's ideal of how customers use their products. Rather I get the impression they're pursuing this begrudgingly just as a way to get into the Indian market; the announcement is notably non-committal about it ever being rolled out in the US.
you are right on. This is google-version of the facebook PR fiasco with free internet. They will never sell youtube RED to that market. RED is only for the san francisco bubble, where everyone already pay $100 overall for streaming services (hulu, netflix, pandora, spotify, etc, etc). But for those other markets, they actually still rely on eyeballs and ads. And on those markets, they have to open a few concessions t…
This is just another example of Google doing just enough in order to measure what may happen (throw stuff at the wall to see what sticks).
Re: YouTube Go: YouTube reimagined for the next generation of YouTube viewers
#83Hopefully this will actually work in all countries; I'd love to save videos for offline viewing while I have a wifi connection and watch them later when I don't. But that would compete with "YouTube Red". For that matter, since an offline video eliminates the buffering problem, I'd love to have the "playback speed" feature in the mobile app. The web version of YouTube supports changing the playback speed to 1.25x, 1.…
Re: YouTube Go: YouTube reimagined for the next generation of YouTube viewers
#84As much as this sounds like something I would personally be very interested in, I can't help but think it doesn't fit into Google's ideal of how customers use their products. Rather I get the impression they're pursuing this begrudgingly just as a way to get into the Indian market; the announcement is notably non-committal about it ever being rolled out in the US.
I would say that I pay for YouTube Red because of in this order: Google Play Music is awesome YouTube offline videos YouTube no ads
Re: YouTube Go: YouTube reimagined for the next generation of YouTube viewers
#85"While in Nagpur, I met a young man who loved using YouTube to watch WWE wrestling and wanted to show us his favorite video. But after he found it and tapped to play, the video just wouldn’t load" I believe this is really bad example, as WWE is a "premium content" so you have to pay extra to watch it. Therefore Youtube removes those videos (there is only 2 WWE videos which is from legal accounts). So it's pretty awkw…
Re: YouTube Go: YouTube reimagined for the next generation of YouTube viewers
#86Re: YouTube Go: YouTube reimagined for the next generation of YouTube viewers
#87"While in Nagpur, I met a young man who loved using YouTube to watch WWE wrestling and wanted to show us his favorite video. But after he found it and tapped to play, the video just wouldn’t load" I believe this is really bad example, as WWE is a "premium content" so you have to pay extra to watch it. Therefore Youtube removes those videos (there is only 2 WWE videos which is from legal accounts). So it's pretty awkw…
Re: YouTube Go: YouTube reimagined for the next generation of YouTube viewers
#88Hopefully this will actually work in all countries; I'd love to save videos for offline viewing while I have a wifi connection and watch them later when I don't. But that would compete with "YouTube Red". For that matter, since an offline video eliminates the buffering problem, I'd love to have the "playback speed" feature in the mobile app. The web version of YouTube supports changing the playback speed to 1.25x, 1.…
I tend to use youtube-dl to grab what I want while at my laptop and sync to my phone so that I have things to watch while about. Not a perfect solution, but works for me for now.
Re: YouTube Go: YouTube reimagined for the next generation of YouTube viewers
#89Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why isn't this a free feature though?
Good question, one that probably has less to do with what Google wants, and what the music industry requires. If you turn off the screen, the "video" is indistinguishable from an audio stream. So they want to track for terms of royalties paid per "listen". This is only feasible on a subscription basis (no one has a good microtransaction model with actual payments) and so Google and the music industry limited the feat…
I mean, if I can minimize a tab running YouTube on my PC, I don't see why I can't do that on my phone.