Live data from Hacker News

Soros, the Open Society Foundations, and the Continued Political Hacks

riskbasedsecurity.com

81–83 of 83 posts

Re: Soros, the Open Society Foundations, and the Continued Political Hacks

#81
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>> People saying it's bad to shoot black people running away from police who aren't armed? >So a criminal suspect should have the universal human right to run away without >being stopped by force? Bonus question: How can a police officer know that a >person running away is not armed? >I don't know where you have read about these supposedly universal human rights, please point me to a link. Shooting fleeing people in…

>Shooting fleeing people in the back is not okay, unless there is some imminent danger Yes it is. Don't want to get shot? Drop on the ground and surrender.

In general - no it isn't.

Shooting someone who is retreating is illegal and doesn't fall under "Stand Your Ground" laws. If someone is retreating - unless they are shooting blindly behind themselves - you are no longer in a life-threatening situation.

Use of deadly force is only authorized in life-threatening situations or when you reasonably believe your life is in danger. Even then, it may be deemed your situation wasn't life threatening or believed to be life threatening. I believe "threat to others" is included in there for certain situations. Eg. police shooting a known armed suspect who is attempting to flee and may be a danger to others.

Obviously, this may vary slightly from state to state. Some states don't have castle doctrine, IIRC, and others are more strict with what falls under "Stand Your Ground" laws.

Re: Soros, the Open Society Foundations, and the Continued Political Hacks

#82
post #81
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Shooting fleeing people in the back is not okay, unless there is some imminent danger Yes it is. Don't want to get shot? Drop on the ground and surrender.

In general - no it isn't. Shooting someone who is retreating is illegal and doesn't fall under "Stand Your Ground" laws. If someone is retreating - unless they are shooting blindly behind themselves - you are no longer in a life-threatening situation. Use of deadly force is only authorized in life-threatening situations or when you reasonably believe your life is in danger. Even then, it may be deemed your situation…

I'm talking about police. Either way. It doesn't matter, you have the gun, you make the arrest. They don't get to just flee.

Re: Soros, the Open Society Foundations, and the Continued Political Hacks

#83
post #82
post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In general - no it isn't. Shooting someone who is retreating is illegal and doesn't fall under "Stand Your Ground" laws. If someone is retreating - unless they are shooting blindly behind themselves - you are no longer in a life-threatening situation. Use of deadly force is only authorized in life-threatening situations or when you reasonably believe your life is in danger. Even then, it may be deemed your situation…

I'm talking about police. Either way. It doesn't matter, you have the gun, you make the arrest. They don't get to just flee.

Still no, except with the exceptions I previously mentioned.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tennessee_v._Garner

Post reply on HN