Live data from Hacker News

Why don't companies use FreeBSD as much in production as Linux?

news.ycombinator.com

81–82 of 82 posts

Re: Why don't companies use FreeBSD as much in production as Linux?

#81
post #60
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> It is easier to copy a solution to a linux problem from stack overflow than to read the FreeBSD handbook, understand the problem and fix it. I'm (a little) ashamed to admit tech support via trolling. Linux sucks because you can't even [whatever]. It is nice to get a quick response of "it's just [whatever], noob". Although, that was a last resort. I've met a couple of people that reread man pages every year, i've ne…

> It is nice to get a quick response Indeed, it is. But one won't learn anything of value. One just learns the solution to a very specific problem. If one chooses to learn the basics, more often than not one will decide that it is quicker to dive into the problem and fix it than to "troll" tech support.

Often finding an answer gives me useful knowledge I can then use in other circumstances, but I can't possibly know every corner of my OS.

Recently I found my only machine running FreeBSD (as a testing machine) was kernel crashing occasionally. On a whim I googled ' kernel crash', and found a page which discussed an extra linux boot-time flag I had to add, to disable some feature of the graphics card. I couldn't figure out how to do the same thing on FreeBSD, so just switched to Debian, and added the magic option. No more crashes. Now the machine runs a FreeBSD VM on top of linux.

Re: Why don't companies use FreeBSD as much in production as Linux?

#82

Some reasons I could think: - It's easier and cheaper to find Linux sysadmins than BSD ones - There's more commercial software supported on Linux - There's more companies offering support for Linux - Linux is more portable than BSD - Linux is one of the standard server OS offered by providers, BSD isn't

How is Linux more portable than BSD?! NetBSD has been ported to nearly every platform known to man, even toasters. I'm surprised that more embedded devices don't run some sort of BSD because they wouldn't have to release code. The PS4's OS is FreeBSD, which they did release a lot of code in return, but they don't have to open source or release all their code (i.e. DRM and other "Security" based stuff) if they don't w…

> The PS4's OS is FreeBSD, which they did release a lot of code in return, but they don't have to open source or > release all their code (i.e. DRM and other "Security" based stuff) if they don't want to.

And that is a 2-way road, where some people cry on forums and maillists anyway, that companies tend to use BSD and not return to community. There is no need to paint it as a win-win situation(distribute proprietary derivate software) when it clearly has its problems too.

Post reply on HN