Earlier quoted context omitted.
What? How on earth multiplatform support could be a bad thing?
If the developer were to have made a swift version for Mac, a C# version for Windows and a C++ version for Linux, that would be very bad. A startup simply cannot reliably keep all up to date, and the product would suffer. If they wrote it in Java and in that way claim multiple platforms, I daresay it would be even worse, on all platforms. If they used a tool that did the conversion for them, it would likely be a secu…
Introducing Bootstrap Studio
81–90 of 142 posts
Re: Introducing Bootstrap Studio
#82I have enjoyed layoutit.com for simple free wireframing. You can define your layout pretty quickly if you have ever made a bootstrap layout before. I know there are other alternatives as well but does anyone have any significant experience with this?Is this a lot better, is this the best one out there?
I'm no great designer and only doing hobby sites but I've found PineGrow ( http://pinegrow.com/ ) quite nice.
They hooked me on the $49 price when I started playing around and I was ready to buy until I saw that the price jumps to $99 if I want master page support and some other nice things.
I realize it is well worth it but I just can't justify a $100 editor for my hobby projects. I just purchased this tool for $25 as its pricing aligns with what I'm willing to spend much better.
Re: Introducing Bootstrap Studio
#83Earlier quoted context omitted.
$50 is nothing for such a tool for a one time payment! Even at that price it is very difficult for the tool to make a profitable full time business model. I want to also add that the 50% discount is not a helpful message either. I always ask my team, how is that as developers we always want free software but yet want a salary hike every year as a software programmer!
Well, the $50 is low for someone who’s going to use it professionally, but if you just want to make one or two sites (and never use it again afterwards), it’s probably a bit too expensive.
The 50% off on the other hand brings it down to where I'm willing to pay for it. So I did.
Re: Introducing Bootstrap Studio
#84IMO this is another example of unnecessary fragmentation of the dev tools ecosystem. Why do we need a whole IDE for Bootstrap? Can't we instead make a plugin for an existing IDE to accomplish the same thing?
Re: Introducing Bootstrap Studio
#85I have a product in a similar space, Beaver Builder (https://www.wpbeaverbuilder.com). A few differences being that it's an in-browser tool and it's a WordPress plugin.
Who is your target customer? Are you hoping to improve workflows for frontend developers or enable non-developers to build web pages? Also, what are your thoughts on maintaining a Bootstrap Studio site?
FWIW, we hit a nice niche with freelance web designers and web agencies. Drag and drop streamlines the development process and it also enables more tech-savvy clients to jump in and make their own edits and updates.
Re: Introducing Bootstrap Studio
#86I'm not a web dev, but I had a plan for some time now for a small sideproject and this seems it has a potential to accelerate things for me. Does it generate fairly vanilla/idiomatic bootstrap? I would take the generated html to the backend, but if I later decided to edit html directly I wouldn't want to deal with weirdness left by your software. What are your payment options? They seems to be hidden behind email for…
Re: Introducing Bootstrap Studio
#87I know this is a Bootstrap tool, which means it has baggage. But if something like this existed for email, I would buy it in a snap. I have yet to find a desktop tool that can make decent responsive html emails, and that is one of the main strengths that Bootstrap should offer. Skip the JQ efects. Perhaps you can make a email mode that is JS free, strips out the unused CSS, and inlines the remaining rules?
You should look into http://www.stampready.net - along with Campaign Monitor's email builder ( https://www.campaignmonitor.com/features/create-custom-email... ), it's one of the best drag-and-drop tools for creating really good, responsive emails. The problem with any of these tools is that they still spit out sometimes convoluted code, but that can't really be avoided since they need to cover their asses in literall…
Re: Introducing Bootstrap Studio
#88Re: Introducing Bootstrap Studio
#89IMO this is another example of unnecessary fragmentation of the dev tools ecosystem. Why do we need a whole IDE for Bootstrap? Can't we instead make a plugin for an existing IDE to accomplish the same thing?
Re: Introducing Bootstrap Studio
#90Developers should be able to put together a Bootstrap front end just as easily in code and probably prefer working in code.
Maybe there's a huge developer market for this and I just happen to not know anyone who'd be into this.