Pay Google to stop seeing ads

Post by [deleted] » Sat, Jan 02, 2016, 8:46 PM UTC

marak830 wrote: post #76

mike_hearn wrote: post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why better quality? A whole lot of the sites I spend most time with are ad supported. It's not clear to me why less money == more quality, in your eyes.

I dont know if i agree (im on the fence), but he did mebtiob spammy click bait titles. There would be a hell of ablot less of those if there were no ad revenue(as ads are loaded when you enter they authors dobt care if you read those spammy articles, just load the damn page). I would like to velieve this is true, but im not sure it would be(in the case of getting well written articles without ads).

[deleted]

Post by riyadparvez » Sun, Jan 03, 2016, 7:00 AM UTC

dajonker wrote: post #50

sandworm101 wrote: post #17

Pay Google? Pay a billion-dollar company to not do something? So, going forward, it will be in Google's interest to make ads ever more annoying and creepy so that people are pushed into paying to end the pain. That is not a world in which I want to live. How about this: Google pays me for watching their annoying ads. Given that I have the upper hand on the tech front (adblockers) and am the one buying the products, s…

Don't forget that Google is a billion-dollar company primarily because they sell a lot of ads. Why do you think Google Search, Gmail, Google Maps, etc. are free to use? Because they make a lot of money (from ads), so they can hire the best developers to build awesome tools that (almost) everybody loves. They could stop doing ads altogether and instead just ask money for using all Google products directly, but it'd ju…

No, some people think every company on internet owe them free service. I use ad-blockers too; but I do not whine out of entitlement. This is the reason I hate ad related discussions - full of entitlements and whinings.

Re: Pay Google to stop seeing ads

Re: Pay Google to stop seeing ads