Live data from Hacker News

Is Mozilla trying hard to kill itself?

infosec.press

791–800 of 851 posts

Re: Is Mozilla trying hard to kill itself?

#791

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Marriage is a right?

If it's a right for some, it should be a right for all.

> If it's a right for some, it should be a right for all.

Why is a woman not allowed to marry an animal? Or a tree? Or more than one person. Minors? Or parents, grandparents?

What? You don't like some of these ideas?

If it's a right for some, it should be a right for all. Or it's only for those you chose.

Re: Is Mozilla trying hard to kill itself?

#792

Earlier quoted context omitted.

well I use it because it can handle 2000 tabs on my m1 macbook air (16gb ram) ... damn do I have adhd?????

Get the OneTab extension. It'll save and close all those tabs. That way you won't have Firefox crashing during startup once you exceed the number of tabs it can handle (a few thousand).

Tip: the crashing is caused by certain extensions such as OneTab and All Tabs Helper which for some reason seem to cause all the tabs to load, just when restoring a session. Temporarily disable these extensions before restoring, then you can reenable.

Re: Is Mozilla trying hard to kill itself?

#793

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can't monetize a browser. They have to keep trying to create new products, but they inevitably fail. Pocket, FirefoxOS, Persona, all dead. This new stuff will fail too, because Mozilla has no USP and no way to create a best-in-class product in any market. So they rely on imitating what everyone else is doing, but with more "crunchy" vibes ("values", "trust", "we're a nonprofit") because that's the only angle they…

I'd pay $10 a month for a browser, I pay that much for music and TV shows and I spend more time in a browser. I'm sure the market doesn't agree with me but I pay more for things that are less useful.

Let's see if you are telling the truth. I will sell you a browser for $10 a month. DM me.

Re: Is Mozilla trying hard to kill itself?

#795

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ditto. A fully functional uBlock Origin is the only remaining reason why I'm still sticking with Firefox despite everything

Containers are also very useful indeed; I have to log into various different Google and Github accounts and can do this in a single browser window.

Yeah I see 1,000 comments about uBO but Containers was/is a game-changer for my workflow.

Re: Is Mozilla trying hard to kill itself?

#796

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I still think it was a mistake for Firefox to dump its old plugin model. The customisation was a USP for Firefox and many useful tweaks and minor features have never been replaced. Today the ability to run proper content blockers is still a selling point for Firefox but obviously wouldn't be if they started to meddle with that as well. (Has there ever been a more obvious case of anticompetitive behaviour than the big…

It made me stop using FF on android.

[deleted]

Re: Is Mozilla trying hard to kill itself?

#797
post #263

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm genuinely curious. What does FireFox mobile have over it's competition? You can't install UBlock Origin on mobile. Like I still use FireFox on mobile, just purely out of habit. I don't really see anything better about it (I am quite inexperienced when it comes to phones).

You can install uBlock Origin on Firefox mobile; it's the only reason I use it.

You can also install uBlock Origin on Edge for Android btw.

Re: Is Mozilla trying hard to kill itself?

#798
post #115
post #85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The whole web ecosystem was first run by VC money Huh? Nexus was funded by CERN. Newsgrounds was never investor funded. Yahoo! Directory was just two guys, and you paid to be listed. There were no investors involved. WebCrawler was a university project. Altavista was a research project.

That was ine inception age when very few people were online, its not the stage of mass adoption. The mass adoption starts with the dot.com era with mass infrastructure build up. But sure, if you think that we should start counting from these years you can do that and add a "public funded" era at the beginning.

I don't think Altavista came before the bubble burst... They directly competed with Google and Yahoo.

Re: Is Mozilla trying hard to kill itself?

#799

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe because they don't know any better.

Of course, but how would you convince them to switch? Not just your friends, but as a whole.

You could suggest installing Firefox next to Chrome and install uBlock Origin on it. Open YouTube and show them that there are zero ads. They will likely see a contrast.

Re: Is Mozilla trying hard to kill itself?

#800
post #9

Well, is no mistery that today the best versioins of Firefox are the non official versions like waterfox and zen. NObody trusts mozilla anymore, specially after they turned into an add company and started paying their CEOs exorbitating ammounts, considering what was being invested in their core business (supposedly making a better browser).

I'm not familiar with Zen, but how do you reconcile that Waterfox frequently lags behind upstream Firefox in terms of security fixes? Yes, you get a perceived gain in privacy, but is that worth potentially exposing yourself to additional vulnerabilities?

IT dosnet lag long, since both have pretty activity communities.

There are other variations that are a little faster in issueing the updates, but they are maintained by small teams, so they have more change of being corrupted by bullshit, specially this day and age where people take politics too damn serious.

Too be honest, except for niche uses, I just abandoned firefox. Their engine is behind, lags in sites that use too much javascript is visible, when even opening 3 or 4 tabs makes they browser lag behind.

I just keep it in my system this days to access some sites in my work computer and test UI rendering in firefox. Other than that, I had to surrender to chrome and its variations.

Post reply on HN