Live data from Hacker News

There's something off about LED bulbs

nymag.com

791–800 of 966 posts

Re: There's something off about LED bulbs

#791
post #167

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The e-waste issues of having to replace entire LED units every two to three years are worse than replacing an old fashioned bulb every decade.

Agreed the e-waste issues are real, but how did you get incandescents to last 10 years? I replaced every dang one after 12 months or less, every time.

my grandma's incandescent nightlight has lasted 35 years and counting. (it's a special bulb, and runs at a very low wattage- perhaps under-spec?)

Re: There's something off about LED bulbs

#792
I know everybody here is a democrat (or a pseudo democrat) so I’ll ask here, when are you people gonna stop finding new regulations to get police to implement?

Like, it really just seems like you people don’t have anything else to do besides mind other peoples business.

Re: There's something off about LED bulbs

#793

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And if you want enclosed rated bulbs there’s not many choices. The GE ones I picked up flicker like crazy.

I've taken to just replacing fixtures instead of trying to make bulbs work with existing, though I'm --> <-- this close to just throwing them all away and going back to kerosene lanterns and some incandescents.

That's what I did and the flickering didn't go away. I don't like the idea of buying fully integrated led fixtures though. Although I might just cave.

Re: There's something off about LED bulbs

#794

There's a lot wrong with LEDs in general and retrofit (E27 bulbs) in particular. In no particular order - LED emitters driven hard for cost reasons, age and fail quickly - Power supplies driven hard for cost reasons, age and fail quickly - Poor CRI and SSRI - Flickering - Dim-to-warm is uncommon - Poorly designed power supplies that age and fail quickly - The same light quality is vastly more expensive to achieve wit…

Everybody already knows these things. Like, why do democrats (not politicians, I mean you people) have a need to enact new regulations everytime they get a chance?

Re: There's something off about LED bulbs

#795

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'll add a second identical anecdote. I've witnessed about a dozen die after about doing about 1/10th their promised duty.

Are they in fixtures designed for incandescents? "Boob lamps" for example are highly efficient LED bulb destroyers, since they don't breathe, and the bulbs overheat.

More anecdata, but I had ~20 lights, of various quality (many Hue, some cheaper Home Depot specials) in boob lamps that survived at least 11 summers in a New England house without AC. Still there probably, but I moved out so I can only vouch for 11 years.

Re: There's something off about LED bulbs

#796

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I do have different memories than you about buying lightbulbs. I remember thinking 60-watt bulbs are frustratingly dim, 75 watt bulbs are a minimum, but what I really wanted every time was a 100 watt bulb, it just improves visual acuity tremendously. And my frustration with LED and flourescents, etc is that I can't find the equivalent of my good old 100 watt bulb; whatever the new rating systems are, it's all an excu…

i had a similar view, until i found COB LED stripes (with dimmers), with 20W per m (LED W, not equivalent, i have mounted a few of those 3-10m (!), and now can have dimmed 1% background lights and hospital style brightness as well.

Do you have a link to these?

Re: There's something off about LED bulbs

#797
post #168

>If you’re lucky, the LED will have a CRI of 90 or higher EU has banned incandescent lights years ago and the situation for LED buyers is much different here. My local drug store chain (Rossmann in Germany) sells 1000lm E27 bulbs under their own Rubin brand with CRI>97 for 4.99€. No flickering and available as 2700K or 4000K. My Opple Light Master 3 even reads CRI 100. So for me right now, it's just going to the drug…

As much as I like EU, the new bulbs are flickery shit.

I bought a stockpile of 150W incandescent bulbs marked as 'shock resistant' (they are definitely not) and they give decent light. The 100W LEDs give more like 50W and flicker too..

Re: There's something off about LED bulbs

#799
post #590

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I use https://www.1000bulbs.com/ because they have godzillion bulbs in stock and it's possible to filter by CRI and color temperature. I just get highest CRI in required color temp, and it's good. More expensive, but well worth it.

As far as I can see this doesn't even show you the CRI just that its 90+ with limited reviews.

Yeah, there is unfortunate need to click on each bulb and read through specs.

Some of the bulbs have exact CRI listed, and some have "90+". I only buy the first kind.

Re: There's something off about LED bulbs

#800

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can go buy high CRI, high quality bulbs right now. Nothing is stopping you. Here is one common vendor: https://store.waveformlighting.com/collections/a19-bulbs/ The issue isn’t that MBAs have cost reduced bulbs for no reason. The issue is that 95% of consumers will only choose the cheap bulbs, period. As a result, that’s what gets produced at scale. > We know how to mass-produce quality LEDs to the point entire T…

And it's fascinating that with LEDs you can ask for a specific wavelength of light ... and get it!

I think you're confusing LEDs with lasers.
Post reply on HN