Live data from Hacker News

Sam Altman's response to Molotov cocktail incident

blog.samaltman.com

781–790 of 1001 posts

Re: Sam Altman's response to Molotov cocktail incident

#781

Jfc. People, a molitov cocktail was thrown as his home. The rest of what is written doesn't matter. This isn't the moment for that conversation. That's his family. He has a fucking child. Holy shit.

Assassinated Iranian nuclear scientists had kids too. There was a thread here a few days ago letting people explore the deaths of children in Palestine. That thread was taken off the front page via flagging.

Re: Sam Altman's response to Molotov cocktail incident

#782

In all seriousness, what is the game plan for society moving forward as AI takes more jobs? The government doesn't seem to care. The AI labs don't seem to care. What happens when more and more people can't afford housing, kids, food, health insurance, etc.? Nothing more dangerous than a man who has no reason to live... I don't advocate for violence, but I do foresee more headlines like this as things get worse.

Nobody has one. If labor stops having value the economy will stop working and society will break down far in advance of building the infrastructure necessary for the promised AI abundance. I like the idea of being ”post-scarcity” as much as the next guy, but I don’t understand how we get there. It’s a project in itself, it doesn’t just happen by magic, and nobody is actively trying to make it happen or has any logist…

It is not impossible to think that many people will just be served an UBI and don't expect much more in life, after all, if we have AI+Family+Housing+Food (assuming gov robots would take care of providing us free food in some form), I bet millions of people would be contented with it.

PS: I include AI as an important one in the future because it will be a direct way to get educated and replace college for example without having to pay (or very cheap).

Re: Sam Altman's response to Molotov cocktail incident

#783
post #112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

That you give random people on the internet the power to decide who you vote for is kind of sad. Calling them low intelligence for it even more so.

I just responded exactly how the OP responded to prove a point.

Re: Sam Altman's response to Molotov cocktail incident

#784
post #734

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're allowed to authorize your technology to be used to kill people, but if you do so, you shouldn't be surprised when those people also try to kill you. America and Americans somehow keep forgetting that actions have consequences and the government can't always override the consequences.

"Authorize" technology to kill you? Are cars authorized to run people over? Are painkillers "authorized" to get people to overdose? Are computer chips "authorized" to be put into bombers? What are you even talking about?

That's what's happening when people want to blame specific persons for world issues instead of the collective.

Re: Sam Altman's response to Molotov cocktail incident

#785

Didn’t we just go through several weeks of hearing about OpenAI allowing its tech to be used for conducting warfare? Not saying that justifies harming Altman but I am confused that he seems surprised he is now in physical danger? [Or chalks it up to just some single specific incendiary article rather than the companies actual actions?] If you involve yourself in the act of killing people then, yeah, you’re going to g…

When was the last time a molotov cocktail was thrown at the house of an arms manufacturer? Trump and other presidents literally started wars and ordered people to be killed. When was the last time they were physically attacked?

[deleted]

Re: Sam Altman's response to Molotov cocktail incident

#786
post #570

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why did I need to scroll halfway down the page before finding a comment that says it was wrong to firebomb his house and nothing else?

Because mob behavior overwhelms everything else.

If anyone else wrote this comment, you would have deadened it due to the bad faith.

Re: Sam Altman's response to Molotov cocktail incident

#788

Earlier quoted context omitted.

GPT is the product-ified version of text transformers, which OpenAI didn't invent or really even contribute to the discovery of. The world changed with Attention is All You Need , and OpenAI was just an early adopter. The biggest thing OpenAI contributed to the broader industry was their API schema.

This sounds like the "acchhshually the iphone wasn't the first touchscreen phone, we had the motorola x34 vr34 t435 that did that one year before". Sure. Does anyone remember that phone? No? Well, the iphone changed the world.

The iPhone was the product-ized version of the smartphone. Smartphones were not a new technology, Apple's implementation of it in the iPhone is not unique. Web browsing, caller ID and MP3 playback were not new or world-changing features for a mobile phone.

"the iPhone changed the world" and "ChatGPT changed the world" are indeed both midwit takes that will get you mocked in technical circles. Both products have a net negative impact on technological progress and directly contribute to the enshittification of their respective market segments.

Re: Sam Altman's response to Molotov cocktail incident

#790

This is both horrible and not at all surprising. Every quarter there are more layoffs and we're told how AI will replace us and that we can do nothing to stop it. We cannot afford the simple things our parents were able to and are supposed to be grateful that we are living in a time with such "amazing" technological progress. Sam is one of the most media-visible people that represents AI replacement of average people…

Sam and related spend half their lives on TV poking the bear laughing about how he is going to use his tech to ruin peoples lives and there is nothing they can do about it. Some of those people have nothing to lose.

Jesus can’t believe I have to white-knight Altman here, but can you point a single video or interview where any of the AI CEOs have been “laughing about how he is going to use his tech to ruin peoples lives.”

This is the exact kind of poisonous, plausible-sounding but false and inflammatory rhetoric that is escalating things.

Post reply on HN